{ "meta": { "title": "FFE book system index", "version": "0.6", "date": "2026-09-16", "book_version": "v2.30", "status": "pre-statute-and-website-freeze-h002-h004-complete", "source_of_truth": "Das_Buch_v2.30_Vorsatzungsfassung_II.md", "updated": "2026-09-16" }, "norm_priority": [ "external_mandatory_law", "charter_rights", "constitutional_principles", "statute_and_orders", "methods", "culture_and_rituals", "experiments" ], "operational_profile_schema": { "fields": [ "id", "core_id", "title", "activate_when", "goal", "must_check", "hard_bounds", "recommended_path", "tools", "culture", "cross_checks", "failure_modes", "escalation", "output", "norm_status" ], "norm_priority": [ "mandatory law", "Fundamental rights", "Constitutional principles", "Satzung/Ordnungen", "Methods", "Kultur/Rituale", "Experiments" ], "coverage": "69/69" }, "core_institutions": [ { "id": "F01", "title": "Grundrechte-Charta", "home": "🧱 CHARTER", "status": "✅ political core of fundamental rights adopted · 🟡 later additions possible · ⚖️ legal embedding later", "related": "F02 Non-participation · F03 Exit · F04 Privacy · F05 Minority protection · F08 Proportionality · D06 Fundamental rights council", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-F01" }, { "id": "F02", "title": "Right not to participate", "home": "🧱 CHARTER", "status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 costs-of-saying-no pilot · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "F01 Fundamental rights · B06 Freedom of ritual · B07 Multiple affiliations · W05 Working modes · B01 Admission", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-F02" }, { "id": "F03", "title": "Exit & portability", "home": "🧱 CHARTER", "status": "✅ political core adopted · 🟡 formal eG exit parameters in the articles of association · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "B01 Admission · W10 Customer pool · K05 Angeberschein · T05 Access power · R03 Friendly separation", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-F03" }, { "id": "F04", "title": "Privacy & data autonomy", "home": "🧱 CHARTER", "status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 data inventory/privacy pilot · ⚖️ GDPR/legal gate", "related": "K10 Rubin AI · T05 Access power · T06 Cybersecurity · B04 Rehabilitation · D07 Power map", "operational_profile": { "activate_when": [ "personal data is processed, linked or used for AI/matching" ], "hard_limits": [ "Data minimisation", "no secret social score", "personal content cannot be viewed merely because of infrastructure access" ], "recommended_path": [ "Zweck klären", "Datenminimum bestimmen", "Zugriff/Speicherfrist definieren", "lokales/privacy-preserving Matching prüfen" ] }, "operational_profile_status": "detailed-v0.1", "operational_profile_id": "OP-F04" }, { "id": "F05", "title": "Equal treatment & minority protection", "home": "🧱 CHARTER", "status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 process pilot · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "F01 Fundamental rights · D06 Fundamental rights council · D09 Conflicts of interest · B01 Admission · W01 Marketplace", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-F05" }, { "id": "F06", "title": "Mission", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "✅ mission adopted · 🟡 later editorial refinement possible", "related": "F07 Negative mission · W02 Tithe · W04 Infrastructure · R04 Growth · R05 Mission balance sheet", "operational_profile": { "activate_when": [ "the mission, growth, a product or promotional language is assessed" ], "hard_limits": [ "personal freedom", "do not confuse the mission with the current business model" ], "recommended_path": [ "vorhandene Ressourcen prüfen", "verbinden/reparieren/teilen vor Neuanschaffung", "Wirkung und Gegenmetrik festhalten" ] }, "operational_profile_status": "detailed-v0.1", "operational_profile_id": "OP-F06" }, { "id": "F07", "title": "Negative mission / anti-cult limits", "home": "🧱 CHARTER", "status": "✅ protective core adopted · 🔬 ongoing experience/research review", "related": "F02 Non-participation · F03 Exit · F04 Privacy · B06 Freedom of ritual · B07 Multiple affiliations · R07 Founder dependence", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-F07" }, { "id": "F08", "title": "Proportionality", "home": "🧱 CHARTER", "status": "✅ political core adopted · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "F01 Fundamental rights · D06 Fundamental rights council · B02 Repair ladder · T01 Safety stop", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-F08" }, { "id": "F09", "title": "Access to law and rules", "home": "🧱 CHARTER", "status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 reader/user tests · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "D08 Norm architecture · K10 Rubin AI · R06 Bureaucracy radar · T10 Fallback · K02 Decision brief", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-F09" }, { "id": "D01", "title": "Affectedness & subsidiarity", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 jurisdiction cases · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "D06 Jurisdiction council · R01 Dynasties · R02 Federation · F01 Fundamental rights", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-D01" }, { "id": "D02", "title": "Voting architecture", "home": "📜 ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION", "status": "✅ political core adopted · ✅ method library v1.0 · 🧪 method pilots · ⚖️ articles/election-law gate", "related": "D04 Deliberation · D05 Sortition councils · D10 Constitutional amendment · K02 Decision brief · W07 Capital & investors", "operational_profile": { "activate_when": [ "a vote or election is being prepared" ], "hard_limits": [ "Method before outcome", "one basic vote per member", "do not override fundamental rights through a majority voting method" ], "recommended_path": [ "Entscheidungstyp bestimmen", "Tragweite/Reversibilität prüfen", "Verfahren vergleichen", "Methode vorab veröffentlichen" ] }, "operational_profile_status": "detailed-v0.1", "operational_profile_id": "OP-D02", "method_library": "M12 / FFE_D02_Entscheidungsverfahren_Bibliothek_v1.0.md" }, { "id": "D03", "title": "Caesar – founder's dignity, right to be heard & representation", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "✅ political core adopted · ⚖️ legal gate if embedded in the articles of association", "related": "D04 Deliberation · D07 Power map · F07 Anti-totalising limits · R07 Founder dependence · K10 Rubin AI", "operational_profile": { "activate_when": [ "Rubin invokes his right to be heard as Caesar in a community decision" ], "hard_limits": [ "no veto", "no additional vote", "no power to issue instructions", "no unlimited delay" ], "recommended_path": [ "Anhörung anmelden", "angemessenen Raum sichern", "unabhängige Beratung ermöglichen", "normal entscheiden" ] }, "operational_profile_status": "detailed-v0.1", "operational_profile_id": "OP-D03" }, { "id": "D04", "title": "Deliberation before decision", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 format pilot · 🔬 research", "related": "K02 Decision brief · K03 Fact–forecast–value · D05 Sortition councils · D02 Voting architecture · D03 Caesar · K07 Decision journal", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-D04" }, { "id": "D05", "title": "Sortition councils / mini-publics", "home": "🧰 METHOD", "status": "✅ methodological direction adopted · 🧪 Schützenfest/sortition council pilot · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "D04 Deliberation · D02 Voting · D06 Rights/jurisdiction · K02 Decision brief · R09 Organisation check", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-D05" }, { "id": "D06", "title": "Conflict, fundamental rights & jurisdiction council", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 case pilot · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "F01 Fundamental rights · F08 Proportionality · D01 Subsidiarity · B02 Repair ladder · B03 Restorative justice · B04 Rehabilitation · D09 Conflicts of interest", "operational_profile": { "activate_when": [ "a conflict, fundamental rights complaint or jurisdiction dispute cannot be resolved on a small scale" ], "hard_limits": [ "no gossip tribunal", "Address conflicts of interest", "Mediation is voluntary", "Privacy" ], "recommended_path": [ "Modus bestimmen", "kleinste passende Ebene", "Stammtisch/Rat mit Mandat", "Abhilfe/Review dokumentieren" ] }, "operational_profile_status": "detailed-v0.1", "operational_profile_id": "OP-D06" }, { "id": "D07", "title": "Power map & mirror council", "home": "🧰 METHOD", "status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 power map/mirror council pilot", "related": "D03 Caesar · D09 Conflict of interest · T07 Network resilience · W07 Investors · R07 Founder dependence · R09 Organisation check", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_links": [ "M08" ], "operational_profile_id": "OP-D07" }, { "id": "D08", "title": "Norm architecture", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "✅ norm architecture adopted · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "F01 Fundamental rights · D10 Constitutional amendment · K01 Evidence system · R08 Lifecycle", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-D08" }, { "id": "D09", "title": "Conflict of interest & recusal", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 process pilot · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "D07 Power map · W01 Marketplace · W07 Investors · D06 Council · R09 Organisation check", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-D09" }, { "id": "D10", "title": "Constitutional amendment & high thresholds", "home": "📜 ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION", "status": "✅ political core adopted · 🟡 majorities/deadlines with the charter and articles of association · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "F01 Fundamental rights · F06 Mission · D08 Norm architecture · D02 Voting · K07 Decision journal", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-D10" }, { "id": "W01", "title": "Opportunities marketplace & matching", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 marketplace pilot · ⚖️ contract/status gate · 🔬 matching research", "related": "W05 Working modes · W08 Quality · W10 Customer pool · K05 Angeberschein · D09 Conflicts of interest · T09 Operations", "operational_profile": { "activate_when": [ "an opportunity, task, resource, position, learning or help opportunity is being matched" ], "hard_limits": [ "no allocation of people", "Working mode visible", "no secret score" ], "recommended_path": [ "Möglichkeitsart bestimmen", "Arbeitsmodus prüfen", "Skills/Risiko/Vergütung zeigen", "freiwilliges Interesse", "transparent matchen" ] }, "operational_profile_status": "detailed-v0.1", "operational_profile_id": "OP-W01" }, { "id": "W02", "title": "Tithe / community contribution", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "✅ tithe regulations v0.1 adopted · 🧪 calculation/operations pilot · ⚖️ tax/contract gate", "related": "W01 Opportunities marketplace · W03 Commons pass · W04 Infrastructure · W05 Working modes · W06 GEG · W10 Customer pool · D09 Conflicts of interest", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-W02" }, { "id": "W03", "title": "Commons-Pass", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 commons pass pilot · ⚖️ ownership/contract gate", "related": "W02 Tithe · W04 Infrastructure · D01 Subsidiarity · F03 Exit · D07 Power map · R08 Lifecycle", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-W03" }, { "id": "W04", "title": "Shared infrastructure", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 business-case pilot · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "W02 Tithe · W03 Commons pass · K10 Rubin AI · F03 Portability · T10 Fallback", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-W04" }, { "id": "W05", "title": "Working modes & fair remuneration", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "✅ political core adopted · ✅ Mojo pilot regulations v0.1 · 🧪 six-month review · ⚖️ employment/tax gate", "related": "W01 Marketplace · W02 Tithe · B05 Care · K05 Academy · F02 Non-participation · W09 Management", "operational_profile": { "activate_when": [ "people work for or through FFE" ], "hard_limits": [ "membership creates no obligation to work", "Mojo does not replace pay", "the work actually performed determines status" ], "recommended_path": [ "Zugehörigkeit", "Arbeitsmodus", "Mandat", "Aufgabe", "Vergütung/Recht/Exit prüfen" ] }, "operational_profile_status": "detailed-v0.1", "operational_profile_id": "OP-W05" }, { "id": "W06", "title": "GEG – shared pot & solidarity fund", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "✅ GEG basic architecture adopted · 🟡 annual budget/sub-fund parameters · 🧪 initial pilot · ⚖️ insurance gate", "related": "B05 Care & mutual aid · W02 Community contribution · W07 Capital · F05 Equal treatment · D09 Conflict of interest", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-W06" }, { "id": "W07", "title": "Cooperative capital & investors", "home": "📜 ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION", "status": "✅ political core adopted · 🟡 amounts/instruments in the economic plan · ⚖️ articles/capital gate", "related": "W02 Community contribution · D02 Voting architecture · D07 Power map · D09 Conflict of interest · R05 Mission balance sheet", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-W07" }, { "id": "W08", "title": "Brand, quality & liability", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open", "related": "W01 Marketplace · K05 Angeberschein · T03 Checklists/handoffs · T08 Postmortem · W04 Infrastructure", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-W08" }, { "id": "W09", "title": "Integrator & management", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open", "related": "W01 Marketplace · W05 Working modes · D07 Power map · D01 Subsidiarity · R07 Succession", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-W09" }, { "id": "W10", "title": "Customer pool & customer relationships as a shared economic commons", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "🧪 experiment · ⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open", "related": "W01 Marketplace · W02 Community contribution · W03 Commons pass · F03 Exit · D09 Conflict of interest", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-W10" }, { "id": "B01", "title": "Admission & onboarding", "home": "📜 ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION", "status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open", "related": "F01 Fundamental rights · F02 Non-participation · F03 Exit · B06 Freedom of ritual · B07 Multiple affiliations · K05 Academy", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-B01" }, { "id": "B02", "title": "Repair ladder", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "🟡 open", "related": "B03 Restorative justice · B04 Rehabilitation · D06 Council · F08 Proportionality · T01 Safety stop", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-B02" }, { "id": "B03", "title": "Restorative justice / restitution", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open", "related": "B02 Repair ladder · B04 Rehabilitation · D06 Council · F08 Proportionality · B06 Freedom of ritual", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-B03" }, { "id": "B04", "title": "Rehabilitation & a new reputation", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "🟡 open", "related": "B02 Repair ladder · B03 Restorative justice · D06 Council · D07 Power map · K05 Angeberschein", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-B04" }, { "id": "B05", "title": "Care & Mutual Aid", "home": "🔥 CULTURE", "status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open", "related": "W06 Solidarity fund · F02 Non-participation · B10 Institutional warmth · K06 Mentoring · F04 Privacy", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-B05" }, { "id": "B06", "title": "Freedom of ritual & costs-of-saying-no test", "home": "🔥 CULTURE", "status": "🟡 open", "related": "F02 Non-participation · B01 Admission · B07 Multiple affiliations · B10 Institutional warmth · R10 Constitution day", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-B06" }, { "id": "B07", "title": "Multiple affiliations", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "🧪 Experiment", "related": "F02 Non-participation · B08 Hospitality · T07 Network resilience · F05 Equal treatment · R01 Dynasties", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-B07" }, { "id": "B08", "title": "Hospitality & open doors", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open", "related": "B01 Admission · B07 Multiple affiliations · F04 Privacy · F05 Equal treatment · T07 Network resilience", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-B08" }, { "id": "B09", "title": "Rumours, gossip & conflict radius", "home": "🧰 METHOD", "status": "🧪 Experiment", "related": "B02 Repair ladder · B04 Rehabilitation · F04 Privacy · D07 Power map · F05 Equal treatment", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-B09" }, { "id": "B10", "title": "Institutional warmth", "home": "🔥 CULTURE", "status": "🧪 Experiment", "related": "F02 Non-participation · B05 Care · B06 Freedom of ritual · B07 Multiple affiliations · B08 Hospitality", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-B10" }, { "id": "K01", "title": "Evidence system", "home": "🧰 METHOD", "status": "✅ foundational core", "related": "K02 Decision brief · K03 Fact–forecast–value · K07 Decision journal · K08 Community laboratory · D08 Norm architecture · R05 Mission balance sheet", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-K01" }, { "id": "K02", "title": "Decision brief", "home": "🧰 METHOD", "status": "🧪 Experiment", "related": "K03 Fact–forecast–value · D04 Deliberation · D02 Voting · K01 Evidence system · K07 Decision journal", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-K02" }, { "id": "K03", "title": "Fact – forecast – value", "home": "🧰 METHOD", "status": "🧪 Experiment", "related": "K01 Evidence system · K02 Decision brief · K07 Forecast ledger · D04 Deliberation · R05 Mission balance sheet", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-K03" }, { "id": "K04", "title": "Expertise & teach-back", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "🧪 Experiment", "related": "K01 Evidence system · D04 Deliberation · K05 Angeberschein · K09 Transactive memory · T01 Safety stop", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-K04" }, { "id": "K05", "title": "Academy, Angeberschein & skill trees", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "✅ rank/competence and advancement architecture adopted · 🧪 assessment/skill-tree pilot · ⚖️ qualification/safety gate · 🔬 research", "related": "K04 Expertise · K06 Mentoring · K09 Transactive memory · W01 Marketplace · W08 Quality · F03 Portability", "operational_profile": { "activate_when": [ "a skill is learned, demonstrated, approved or translated into a rank/authority" ], "hard_limits": [ "no overall ranking of a person", "respect external qualifications", "do not shame people for not passing" ], "recommended_path": [ "Lernpfad", "passende Evidenz", "Prüf-/Nachweisfenster", "Angeberschein aktualisieren", "freiwilliges Aufstiegsfest" ] }, "operational_profile_status": "detailed-v0.1", "operational_profile_id": "OP-K05" }, { "id": "K06", "title": "Mentoring & multiplying knowledge", "home": "🧰 METHOD", "status": "🧪 Experiment", "related": "K05 Angeberschein · K09 Transactive memory · T04 Bus factor · W05 Working modes · D07 Power map", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-K06" }, { "id": "K07", "title": "Decision journal & review", "home": "🧰 METHOD", "status": "🧪 Experiment", "related": "K01 Evidence system · K02 Decision brief · K08 Community laboratory · R05 Mission balance sheet · T08 Postmortem", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-K07" }, { "id": "K08", "title": "Community-Labor", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "🧪 Experiment · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "K01 Evidence system · K07 Decision journal · R08 Institutional lifecycle · F01 Fundamental rights · F04 Privacy", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-K08" }, { "id": "K09", "title": "Transactive memory / “Who knows what?”", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "🧪 Experiment · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "K05 Angeberschein · K06 Mentoring · K10 Rubin AI · T04 Bus factor · D07 Power map", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-K09" }, { "id": "K10", "title": "Rubin AI as a navigator", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "🧪 Experiment · ⚖️ legal gate · 🔬 research", "related": "F04 Privacy · F09 Access to rules · D08 Norm architecture · W01 Marketplace · K01 Evidence · T05 Access power · T06 Cybersecurity · T10 Fallback", "operational_profile": { "activate_when": [ "AI generates rules, recommendations or instructions from the book" ], "hard_limits": [ "no final political authority", "no invented norm", "respect the priority of norms", "manual fallback" ], "recommended_path": [ "relevante Seiten routen", "Pflichtfragen/Grenzen laden", "mildesten ausreichenden Weg", "Status/Unsicherheit/Eskalation ausgeben" ] }, "operational_profile_status": "detailed-v0.1", "operational_profile_id": "OP-K10" }, { "id": "T01", "title": "Stop-the-line / safety stop", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open", "related": "F08 Proportionality · B02 Repair ladder · T02 Incident mode · T08 Postmortem · K04 Expertise · W05 Working modes", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-T01" }, { "id": "T02", "title": "Incident-Modus", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open", "related": "T01 Safety stop · T08 Postmortem · F08 Proportionality · T10 Fallback · D01 Subsidiarity", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-T02" }, { "id": "T03", "title": "Checklists, closed loop & handoffs", "home": "🧰 METHOD", "status": "🧪 Experiment · 🔬 research", "related": "T01 Safety stop · T02 Incident mode · W09 Integrator · W08 Quality · T08 Postmortem", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-T03" }, { "id": "T04", "title": "Bus factor & continuity", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "🧪 Experiment", "related": "R07 Succession · T10 Fallback · W04 Infrastructure · K09 Transactive memory · D07 Power map", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-T04" }, { "id": "T05", "title": "Digital constitution & access power", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "🟡 open · 🔬 research", "related": "K10 Rubin AI · F04 Privacy · D07 Power map · T06 Security · T10 Fallback", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-T05" }, { "id": "T06", "title": "Cybersecurity & Privacy Engineering", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "🧪 Experiment · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "F04 Privacy · T05 Access power · T02 Incident mode · T10 Fallback · K10 Rubin AI", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-T06" }, { "id": "T07", "title": "Network resilience", "home": "🧰 METHOD", "status": "🧪 Experiment", "related": "D07 Power map · B07 Multiple affiliations · K09 Transactive memory · T04 Bus factor · R01 Dynasties", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-T07" }, { "id": "T08", "title": "Error report & postmortem", "home": "🧰 METHOD", "status": "🧪 Experiment", "related": "T01 Safety stop · K07 Decision journal · B02 Repair ladder · B04 Rehabilitation · R09 Organisation check", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-T08" }, { "id": "T09", "title": "Operations & logistics", "home": "⚙️ REGULATION", "status": "🧪 Experiment · 🔬 research", "related": "W01 Marketplace · W09 Integrator · T03 Handoffs · W04 Infrastructure · R06 Bureaucracy radar", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-T09" }, { "id": "T10", "title": "Graceful degradation & manual fallback", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "🧪 Experiment", "related": "K10 Rubin AI · T04 Bus factor · T05 Access power · T02 Incident mode · F09 Access to rules", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-T10" }, { "id": "R01", "title": "Dynasties & polycentric circles", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "✅ dynasty/office/development architecture adopted · 🧪 organisation pilot · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "D01 Subsidiarity · W03 Commons pass · B07 Multiple affiliations · T07 Network resilience · R02 Federation", "operational_profile": { "activate_when": [ "a dynasty is founded, expanded or organisationally overloaded" ], "hard_limits": [ "fundamental rights independent of rank", "offices only for real tasks", "no obligation to advance" ], "recommended_path": [ "Fähigkeiten/Kapazität kartieren", "Trigger erkennen", "Ämter-/Ratsvarianten anbieten", "Kultur lokal wählen", "Review/Rückbau" ] }, "operational_profile_status": "detailed-v0.1", "operational_profile_id": "OP-R01" }, { "id": "R02", "title": "Federation / Die Illuminati", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "✅ federal direction and cultural name adopted · 🟡 specific powers later · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "R01 Dynasties · D01 Subsidiarity · W03 Commons · W07 Capital · T07 Network resilience · R03 Friendly separation", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-R02" }, { "id": "R03", "title": "Friendly separation", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open", "related": "F03 Exit & portability · R01 Dynasties · R02 Federation · W10 Customer pool · W03 Commons", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-R03" }, { "id": "R04", "title": "Growth check", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "🧪 Experiment", "related": "F06 Mission · R05 Mission balance sheet · R02 Federation · W07 Capital · R09 Organisation check", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-R04" }, { "id": "R05", "title": "Mission balance sheet & drift watch", "home": "🧰 METHOD", "status": "🧪 Experiment", "related": "F06 Mission · W02 Tithe · W04 Infrastructure · R04 Growth · R09 Organisation check", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-R05" }, { "id": "R06", "title": "Bureaucracy radar", "home": "🧰 METHOD", "status": "🧪 Experiment · 🔬 research", "related": "F09 Access to rules · K10 Rubin AI · R09 Organisation check · R08 Lifecycle · W04 Infrastructure", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-R06" }, { "id": "R07", "title": "Founder dependence & succession", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "✅ founder/succession core adopted · 🧪 developing the founder memory", "related": "D03 Caesar · D07 Power map · T04 Bus factor · W09 Management · R08 Lifecycle", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-R07" }, { "id": "R08", "title": "Institutionen-Lebenszyklus", "home": "🏛️ CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE", "status": "🧪 Experiment · ⚖️ legal gate", "related": "K08 Community laboratory · R06 Bureaucracy radar · R09 Organisation check · D10 Constitutional amendment · R10 Constitution day", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-R08" }, { "id": "R09", "title": "Organisations-Check", "home": "🧰 METHOD", "status": "🧪 Experiment", "related": "D07 Power map · R05 Mission balance sheet · R06 Bureaucracy radar · T04 Bus factor · F03 Exit · R10 Constitution day", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-R09" }, { "id": "R10", "title": "Constitution Day", "home": "🔥 CULTURE", "status": "🧪 Experiment", "related": "D10 Constitutional amendment · R05 Mission balance sheet · R09 Organisation check · R08 Lifecycle · D07 Power map · K07 Decision journal", "operational_profile": null, "operational_profile_status": "core-page-awaiting-dedicated-profile", "operational_profile_id": "OP-R10" } ], "modules": [ { "id": "M01", "title": "Operational AI constitution", "status": "complete-69-of-69-operational-profiles", "source_file": "FFE_Operative_KI_Profile_69_v1.0.md" }, { "id": "M02", "title": "Arbeitsmodus-Karte", "status": "confirmed+legal-gate" }, { "id": "M03", "title": "Living revision", "status": "confirmed" }, { "id": "M04", "title": "Terminology", "status": "confirmed+open-names" }, { "id": "M05", "title": "Development network", "status": "confirmed-direction-experimental-implementation", "source_file": "FFE_Entwicklungsnetz_v0.2.json" }, { "id": "M06", "title": "Living city map", "status": "confirmed-direction-experimental-app-and-matching", "source_file": "FFE_Lebendige_Stadtkarte_v0.1.md" }, { "id": "M07", "title": "Wish system & personal AI", "status": "open-experiment", "source_file": "FFE_Wunschsystem_und_persoenliche_KI_v0.1.md" }, { "id": "M08", "title": "Mojo ecosystem & pilot framework", "status": "approved-six-month-pilot", "routes_to": [ "D07", "W05", "K05", "K07", "B03", "B04", "R01" ], "source_file": "FFE_Mojo_Ordnung_v0.1.md" }, { "id": "M09", "title": "Rubine – a later development phase", "status": "parked", "routes_to": [ "W03", "W04", "W05", "W07", "M07" ] }, { "id": "M10", "title": "Machine-readable system index", "status": "active-v0.5" }, { "id": "M11", "title": "Pre-articles status & limits of derivation", "status": "active-pre-statute-and-website-freeze", "source_file": "FFE_Satzungsableitungs_Matrix_v0.2.md" }, { "id": "M12", "title": "D02 decision-making method library v1.0", "status": "complete-22-method-cards", "source_file": "FFE_D02_Entscheidungsverfahren_Bibliothek_v1.0.md", "routes_to": [ "D02", "D04", "D05", "D10", "K02", "K10" ] } ], "terminology": [ { "id": "B001", "entry": "Tithe", "function": "a fixed 10% community share of the defined community base of an externally monetised FFE value transaction", "neutral_term": "Community-Beitrag", "cultural_name": "Tithe", "naming_authority": "Rubin", "status": "✅ tithe regulations v0.1" }, { "id": "B002", "entry": "Caesar", "function": "petition, agenda-setting and a special right to be heard without power to rule", "neutral_term": "Petition/dialogue steward", "cultural_name": "Caesar", "naming_authority": "Rubin", "status": "✅ established" }, { "id": "B003", "entry": "Mojo", "function": "a social system for prestige, reflection and development with Bussies, four main branches, a life/season view, competition and a repair path", "neutral_term": "Recognition system", "cultural_name": "Mojo", "naming_authority": "Rubin", "status": "✅ pilot regulations v0.1 · 🧪 six-month review" }, { "id": "B004", "entry": "Rubine", "function": "an exchange system to be developed independently at a later stage; explicitly not Mojo", "neutral_term": "economic benefit / unit", "cultural_name": "Rubine", "naming_authority": "Rubin", "status": "⏸️ deliberately deferred" }, { "id": "B005", "entry": "Dynasty", "function": "autonomous FFE circle / sub-community", "neutral_term": "autonomous circle", "cultural_name": "Dynasty", "naming_authority": "Rubin", "status": "✅ established" }, { "id": "B006", "entry": "Die Illuminati", "function": "a federal level between several communities", "neutral_term": "Federation / federal council", "cultural_name": "Die Illuminati", "naming_authority": "Rubin", "status": "✅ established" }, { "id": "B007", "entry": "Schützenfest", "function": "a limited real-world democracy pilot with a budget and jurisdiction", "neutral_term": "Governance-Pilot", "cultural_name": "Schützenfest", "naming_authority": "Rubin", "status": "✅ established" }, { "id": "B008", "entry": "Talking stone", "function": "a tool for orderly speaking and listening", "neutral_term": "Conversation tool", "cultural_name": "Talking stone", "naming_authority": "Rubin/WG", "status": "✅ established" }, { "id": "B009", "entry": "Loyaler Stachel", "function": "a role/method for benevolent, genuine dissent", "neutral_term": "critical dissenting voice", "cultural_name": "Loyaler Stachel", "naming_authority": "Rubin/WG", "status": "✅ established" }, { "id": "B010", "entry": "Hofnarr", "function": "may challenge power, habits and overconfidence with humour", "neutral_term": "Critiquing power through humour", "cultural_name": "Hofnarr", "naming_authority": "Rubin/WG", "status": "✅ established" }, { "id": "B011", "entry": "OFFEN", "function": "a protection test for outsiders, unpopular people and people with few social connections", "neutral_term": "Outsider/minority protection test", "cultural_name": "open", "naming_authority": "Rubin/WG", "status": "🟡 new name needed" }, { "id": "B012", "entry": "Day of dead rules", "function": "a ritual/day for burying, repairing or archiving outdated rules", "neutral_term": "Regel-Abschaffungsritual", "cultural_name": "Day of dead rules", "naming_authority": "WG/Community", "status": "✅ name established" }, { "id": "B013", "entry": "Constitution Day", "function": "a regular shared review of rights, power, mission and rules", "neutral_term": "Governance-Reviewtag", "cultural_name": "Constitution Day", "naming_authority": "Shared household/founding group", "status": "✅ name established · 🟡 frequency open" }, { "id": "B014", "entry": "Genossen ehren Genossen (GEG)", "function": "a shared pot for community support/resources", "neutral_term": "shared pot", "cultural_name": "Genossen ehren Genossen (GEG)", "naming_authority": "Rubin", "status": "✅ established" }, { "id": "B015", "entry": "Angeberschein", "function": "portable, member-controlled competence record", "neutral_term": "Competence pass", "cultural_name": "Angeberschein", "naming_authority": "Rubin", "status": "✅ established" }, { "id": "B016", "entry": "Nein-Kosten-Test", "function": "checks whether participation is truly voluntary", "neutral_term": "Voluntariness check", "cultural_name": "Nein-Kosten-Test", "naming_authority": "Rubin", "status": "✅ established" }, { "id": "B017", "entry": "Einstein der Weisen", "function": "a contact point/format for when knowledge is missing and suitable expertise needs to be found", "neutral_term": "Wissens-/Expertiserouting", "cultural_name": "Einstein der Weisen", "naming_authority": "Rubin", "status": "✅ established" }, { "id": "B018", "entry": "Stachelrunde", "function": "a structured round for opposing positions", "neutral_term": "Dissent round", "cultural_name": "Stachelrunde", "naming_authority": "Rubin/WG", "status": "✅ established" }, { "id": "B019", "entry": "Rule tribunal / Rule Court", "function": "keep, repair, test or bury a rule", "neutral_term": "Rule review", "cultural_name": "Rule tribunal / Rule Court", "naming_authority": "Rubin/WG", "status": "🟡 working name" }, { "id": "B020", "entry": "Museum of dead rules", "function": "an archive of abolished rules and the reasons for abolishing them", "neutral_term": "Rule archive", "cultural_name": "Museum of dead rules", "naming_authority": "Rubin/WG", "status": "✅ established" }, { "id": "B021", "entry": "Commons-Pass", "function": "a governance tool for shared resources; explicitly not GEG", "neutral_term": "Commons-Governance-Karte", "cultural_name": "Commons-Pass", "naming_authority": "Rubin", "status": "✅ retained as a separate tool" }, { "id": "B022", "entry": "Local circle", "function": "a small local advisory/decision-making circle; its specific authority depends on its mandate", "neutral_term": "small council", "cultural_name": "Local circle", "naming_authority": "Rubin / freely chosen locally", "status": "✅ general name established" }, { "id": "B023", "entry": "OFFEN", "function": "a larger council format for coordination, representation or several sub-circles", "neutral_term": "Larger council", "cultural_name": "open", "naming_authority": "Rubin / local communities", "status": "🟡 name needed" }, { "id": "B024", "entry": "Advancement celebration [working name]", "function": "a shared celebration after passing a development/mastery level", "neutral_term": "Transition/completion celebration", "cultural_name": "open", "naming_authority": "Rubin / local communities", "status": "🟡 cultural name needed" }, { "id": "B025", "entry": "Opportunities marketplace", "function": "connects work, learning, help, commons and projects", "neutral_term": "Chancen-/Matching-Plattform", "cultural_name": "Opportunities marketplace", "naming_authority": "Rubin", "status": "✅ functional name established" }, { "id": "B026", "entry": "Living city map", "function": "a graph connecting people, things, places, tasks and communities", "neutral_term": "local commons/opportunities network", "cultural_name": "Living city map", "naming_authority": "Rubin / open", "status": "🟡 working title" }, { "id": "B027", "entry": "Development network", "function": "a graph of skills, offices and organisation for people and dynasties", "neutral_term": "Development graph", "cultural_name": "Development network", "naming_authority": "Rubin", "status": "✅ functional name established" }, { "id": "B028", "entry": "Bussi", "function": "a small, voluntary, specific thank-you; not formal Mojo yet", "neutral_term": "accessible recognition", "cultural_name": "Bussi / Bussies", "naming_authority": "Rubin", "status": "✅ established" }, { "id": "B029", "entry": "Mojo-Karte", "function": "a documented formal community contribution with impact, evidence and confirmation", "neutral_term": "Contribution card", "cultural_name": "Mojo-Karte", "naming_authority": "FFE", "status": "✅ pilot" }, { "id": "B030", "entry": "Mojo-Stammtisch", "function": "a small rotating review group for larger or sensitive Mojo entries", "neutral_term": "Mojo review circle", "cultural_name": "Mojo-Stammtisch", "naming_authority": "FFE", "status": "✅ pilot" }, { "id": "B031", "entry": "Mojo-Spotlight", "function": "a limited, non-transferable visibility right for a project or topic", "neutral_term": "Priority signal", "cultural_name": "Mojo-Spotlight", "naming_authority": "FFE", "status": "✅ pilot" } ], "development_network": { "title": "FFE development network", "version": "0.2", "date": "2026-09-10", "status": "🧪 prototype – not canonical yet", "architecture": "Technically a graph; the UI may display a tree, rings or a neural network.", "core_rules": [ "Fundamental rights are independent of rank, skill, fame, money, Mojo or office.", "A higher ring means a wider scope of responsibility, not a higher human worth.", "Unlocking means a recommendation or demonstrated skill; only law/safety/contracts can create genuinely mandatory gates.", "People may use several archetypes at the same time.", "The tree is not a happiness score or a global life ranking.", "Each node will later need evidence, failure modes, when-not-to-use guidance and review.", "Suitable levels are earned in regular assessment/evidence windows; successful advancement can then be celebrated voluntarily in cohorts." ], "rings": [ { "ring": 1, "name": "Self", "meaning": "Personal skill, self-direction and safe practice." }, { "ring": 2, "name": "Project", "meaning": "Responsibility for specific tasks, projects and outcomes." }, { "ring": 3, "name": "People", "meaning": "Others are directly affected: team, audience, learners, guests." }, { "ring": 4, "name": "Institution", "meaning": "Long-term roles, offices, resources, employees or a large public audience." }, { "ring": 5, "name": "Network", "meaning": "Several groups, broad reach, a federation or long-term societal impact." } ], "branches": [ { "id": "SELF", "icon": "🌱", "name": "The art of living & personal development", "purpose": "Autonomy, relationships, stability, meaning, play and self-chosen development." }, { "id": "SOCIAL", "icon": "❤️", "name": "Social & community", "purpose": "Collaboration, conflict skills, care, facilitation and community responsibility." }, { "id": "KNOW", "icon": "🧠", "name": "Knowledge, learning & teaching", "purpose": "Find, check and pass on knowledge and make it available as shared memory." }, { "id": "CRAFT", "icon": "🛠️", "name": "Craft, technology & safety", "purpose": "Practical skills, evidence, safe independent work, quality and mentoring." }, { "id": "CREATOR", "icon": "🎭", "name": "Creativity, public presence & influence", "purpose": "Support creators, artists and influencers as their reach and responsibility grow." }, { "id": "ENTERPRISE", "icon": "🏗️", "name": "Businesses, projects & employer responsibility", "purpose": "Develop suitable roles, processes and controls from a single commission through to an organisation." }, { "id": "CIVIC", "icon": "🏛️", "name": "Public responsibility & governance", "purpose": "Develop participation, transparency and accountability for mayors, mandate holders and publicly influential roles." }, { "id": "COMMUNITY", "icon": "🏘️", "name": "Dynasty, local community & federation", "purpose": "Support growing local communities and dynasties with councils, offices, commons and federation." }, { "id": "OMNI", "icon": "💎", "name": "Omnikünstler path", "purpose": "Make broad development across several fields visible and connect it meaningfully." } ], "views": [ { "id": "VIEW-CRAFT", "name": "Craftsperson", "focus": [ "CRAFT", "KNOW", "ENTERPRISE", "SOCIAL" ], "example": "Welding competence → external welding qualification → expanded tasks → quality responsibility or mentoring." }, { "id": "VIEW-STAR", "name": "Star / Influencer / Creator", "focus": [ "CREATOR", "SOCIAL", "CIVIC", "COMMUNITY" ], "example": "Audience grows → moderation/privacy → crisis communication → consequences of influence → independent community structures." }, { "id": "VIEW-BOSS", "name": "Entrepreneur with employees", "focus": [ "ENTERPRISE", "SOCIAL", "KNOW", "COMMUNITY" ], "example": "Own commission → employees → financial/people responsibility → delegation → independent oversight." }, { "id": "VIEW-MAYOR", "name": "Mayor / public responsibility", "focus": [ "CIVIC", "SOCIAL", "COMMUNITY", "KNOW" ], "example": "Mandate → explain publicly → participation → minority protection → greater accountability as impact grows." }, { "id": "VIEW-DYNASTY", "name": "Dynasty / local community", "focus": [ "COMMUNITY", "SOCIAL", "KNOW", "ENTERPRISE" ], "example": "Shared action → local circle/commons → offices triggered by need → larger council → network → Die Illuminati." }, { "id": "VIEW-OMNI", "name": "Omnikünstler", "focus": [ "OMNI", "SELF", "KNOW", "CRAFT", "CREATOR", "ENTERPRISE" ], "example": "Many skills → pockets of depth → connect domains → integrate across disciplines → build systems." } ], "celebration_framework": { "working_name": "Advancement celebration [cultural name still open]", "principle": "Celebrations are not automatically triggered by a node. Suitable levels have regular voluntary assessment/evidence windows. Anyone who passes a level through the appropriate process can be honoured with their cohort in a separate transition celebration.", "flow": [ "Lern-/Praxisphase", "Register for the next assessment or evidence window", "an appropriate form of evidence for each skill", "fair assessment against criteria known in advance", "on passing: update level / authority / Angeberschein", "a shared advancement celebration for all successful participants", "then make new opportunities and responsibilities visible" ], "assessment_modes": [ { "mode": "Praxisprüfung", "best_for": "specific craft, technical or operational skills", "example": "a workpiece, safe execution, fault diagnosis" }, { "mode": "Portfolio / Könnerstück", "best_for": "creative, project-based or hard-to-assess-at-one-moment skills", "example": "a completed project plus an explanation of the decisions" }, { "mode": "Beobachtete Praxis", "best_for": "social, facilitation, care or leadership skills", "example": "several real situations rather than an artificial one-off assessment" }, { "mode": "Teach-back / mündliche Prüfung", "best_for": "knowledge, understanding and the ability to explain", "example": "explain the matter, answer follow-up questions, name limits" }, { "mode": "Externer Nachweis", "best_for": "legally, normatively or professionally standardised qualifications", "example": "a welding qualification, driving licence, formal certification" }, { "mode": "Peer-/Mehrfachbewertung", "best_for": "skills where several perspectives are useful", "example": "standardised criteria, several assessors rather than a popularity vote" } ], "assessment_rules": [ "Not every skill needs an assessment.", "The form of evidence follows the type of skill, not a uniform ritual.", "Criteria must be known before the assessment.", "Assessors must be suitably qualified and free from relevant conflicts of interest.", "Failures are not publicly celebrated or used to shame people.", "Retakes and learning paths must be possible.", "For safety-critical skills, reassessments or expiry dates may be appropriate.", "A passed rank demonstrates a specific skill or readiness for responsibility, not a higher human worth." ], "celebration_eligible_events": [ "a mastery level passed", "a completed qualifying piece / portfolio", "external proof of qualification", "a mentor or assessor level reached", "successfully completed training/learning phase", "an organisational level achieved together by a dynasty" ], "celebration_format": { "cohort_based": true, "description": "Everyone who passed a level in the relevant period can be honoured together at an assembly / celebration — similar to a transition or coming-of-age ritual, but culturally designed freely by FFE or the local community concerned.", "building_blocks": [ "a shared entrance / opening", "make a qualifying piece, learning path or short story visible", "thank mentors and helpers", "symbolically present a badge, artefact or Angeberschein", "publicly reveal the new level only with consent", "music, food, dance, games or local rituals", "name new responsibilities and opportunities", "shared completion" ] }, "hard_limits": [ "voluntary participation in the celebration", "no humiliation, painful initiation or dare", "no forced publicity", "no publication of failed assessments", "no obligation to consume", "no disproportionate costs", "no loss of fundamental rights for non-participation", "no popularity vote as a substitute for competence assessment" ], "privacy": "Assessment results and visibility at the celebration are handled separately. A person can receive a level without having to be celebrated publicly." }, "nodes": [ { "id": "SELF-01", "branch": "SELF", "title": "Name your own goals", "kind": "reflection", "ring": 1, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Formulate your own goals, values and desired directions in life.", "prerequisites": [], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "F02", "F03", "K07" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "keine Prüfung; selbstbestimmter Entwicklungsmarker" }, { "id": "SELF-02", "branch": "SELF", "title": "Boundaries & saying no", "kind": "skill", "ring": 1, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Communicate your own boundaries and respect other people's boundaries.", "prerequisites": [], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "F02", "B06" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🟢/🟡 book basis", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "passende Nachweisform" }, { "id": "SELF-03", "branch": "SELF", "title": "Reliability", "kind": "skill", "ring": 1, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Make realistic commitments, flag problems early and arrange clear handovers.", "prerequisites": [], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "T03", "K07" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "passende Nachweisform" }, { "id": "SELF-04", "branch": "SELF", "title": "Personal review", "kind": "method", "ring": 2, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Regularly review what works, takes energy, needs to be learned or should end.", "prerequisites": [ "SELF-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "K07", "R09" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "keine persönliche Rangprüfung erforderlich" }, { "id": "SELF-05", "branch": "SELF", "title": "Basic financial orientation", "kind": "knowledge", "ring": 2, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Keep track of your own income, spending, risks and obligations.", "prerequisites": [], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🔍 research + external law depending on context", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Teach-back / Wissensnachweis nur falls nötig" }, { "id": "SELF-06", "branch": "SELF", "title": "Play, curiosity & creativity", "kind": "practice", "ring": 1, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Preserve exploration and self-chosen projects as a legitimate part of development.", "prerequisites": [], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🔍 research later", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "keine persönliche Rangprüfung erforderlich" }, { "id": "SELF-07", "branch": "SELF", "title": "Contribution & meaning", "kind": "reflection", "ring": 2, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Explore where your skills could voluntarily help others or shared projects.", "prerequisites": [ "SELF-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "B05", "W01" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "keine Prüfung; selbstbestimmter Entwicklungsmarker" }, { "id": "SOCIAL-01", "branch": "SOCIAL", "title": "Good conversation", "kind": "skill", "ring": 1, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Listen, check understanding and make differences visible.", "prerequisites": [], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "D04", "K04" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "passende Nachweisform" }, { "id": "SOCIAL-02", "branch": "SOCIAL", "title": "Address conflict directly", "kind": "skill", "ring": 2, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Handle small conflicts on as small a scale as possible with those directly affected.", "prerequisites": [ "SOCIAL-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "B02", "D06" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "passende Nachweisform" }, { "id": "SOCIAL-03", "branch": "SOCIAL", "title": "Use mediation", "kind": "method", "ring": 2, "scope": [ "person", "dynasty" ], "summary": "Bring in voluntary, neutral support when a conflict is stuck.", "prerequisites": [ "SOCIAL-02" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "B02", "B03" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "keine persönliche Rangprüfung erforderlich" }, { "id": "SOCIAL-04", "branch": "SOCIAL", "title": "Facilitate", "kind": "skill", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Structure conversations, ensure participation and limit your own power as a facilitator.", "prerequisites": [ "SOCIAL-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "D04", "D09" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "passende Nachweisform", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "SOCIAL-05", "branch": "SOCIAL", "title": "Become a mentor", "kind": "role", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Support others in learning without demanding dependence or loyalty.", "prerequisites": [ "KNOW-04" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "K06" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Kompetenznachweis + Mandat; ggf. beobachtete Praxis", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "SOCIAL-06", "branch": "SOCIAL", "title": "Coordinate care", "kind": "role", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "person", "community" ], "summary": "Organise voluntary help, respect boundaries and do not imitate professional help.", "prerequisites": [ "SOCIAL-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "B05", "W06" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Kompetenznachweis + Mandat; ggf. beobachtete Praxis" }, { "id": "KNOW-01", "branch": "KNOW", "title": "Use Einstein der Weisen", "kind": "method", "ring": 1, "scope": [ "person", "community" ], "summary": "When knowledge is missing: make it visible who can help, explain, research or find expertise.", "prerequisites": [], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "K09", "K04" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "keine persönliche Rangprüfung erforderlich" }, { "id": "KNOW-02", "branch": "KNOW", "title": "Teach-back", "kind": "method", "ring": 2, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Check understanding through explanation back, rather than merely assuming it.", "prerequisites": [ "KNOW-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "K04" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "keine persönliche Rangprüfung erforderlich" }, { "id": "KNOW-03", "branch": "KNOW", "title": "Angeberschein: document a skill", "kind": "credential", "ring": 2, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Document a specific skill with evidence, experience level and, where relevant, an external qualification.", "prerequisites": [], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "K05" ], "gate": "evidence", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "externer Nachweis oder standardisierte Prüfung", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "KNOW-04", "branch": "KNOW", "title": "Teach", "kind": "skill", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Pass on knowledge so that others can become independent.", "prerequisites": [ "KNOW-03" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "K06" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "passende Nachweisform", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "KNOW-05", "branch": "KNOW", "title": "Assess / confirm quality", "kind": "role", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Assess subject-specific evidence or quality when competence and independence are sufficient.", "prerequisites": [ "KNOW-03" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "K05", "W08", "D09" ], "gate": "competence+mandate", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Kompetenznachweis + Mandat; ggf. beobachtete Praxis", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "KNOW-06", "branch": "KNOW", "title": "Knowledge steward", "kind": "office", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "dynasty", "community" ], "summary": "Keep a group's knowledge, sources, contact people and knowledge gaps up to date.", "prerequisites": [ "KNOW-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "K09", "K10" ], "gate": "mandate", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Mandat + erforderliche Kompetenzen; Amt selbst ist kein persönlicher Rang", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "CRAFT-01", "branch": "CRAFT", "title": "Tool & safety basics", "kind": "skill", "ring": 1, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Use tools safely in your own field and know the limits of your competence.", "prerequisites": [], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "T01", "K05", "W08" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "passende Nachweisform" }, { "id": "CRAFT-02", "branch": "CRAFT", "title": "Work independently", "kind": "capability", "ring": 2, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Carry out a clearly defined activity independently to the agreed quality.", "prerequisites": [ "CRAFT-01", "KNOW-03" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "K05", "W01" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Praxisprüfung / beobachtete Praxis / externer Nachweis je Kontext", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "CRAFT-10", "branch": "CRAFT", "title": "Welding competence", "kind": "skill", "ring": 2, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Document welding as a specific professional skill in the Angeberschein.", "prerequisites": [ "CRAFT-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "K05" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "passende Nachweisform" }, { "id": "CRAFT-11", "branch": "CRAFT", "title": "Welding qualification / external certificate", "kind": "credential", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Record an externally recognised qualification where the activity, standard or commission requires it.", "prerequisites": [ "CRAFT-10" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [], "gate": "external-law-or-standard", "evidence_status": "⚖️ external qualification depending on the activity", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "externer Nachweis oder standardisierte Prüfung", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "CRAFT-12", "branch": "CRAFT", "title": "Advanced welding tasks", "kind": "capability", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Take on tasks requiring demonstrated additional welding competence.", "prerequisites": [ "CRAFT-11" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [], "gate": "external+competence", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "Specific authority depends on the law, standard, commission and safety requirement.", "assessment_mode": "Praxisprüfung / beobachtete Praxis / externer Nachweis je Kontext" }, { "id": "CRAFT-13", "branch": "CRAFT", "title": "Craft mentor", "kind": "role", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Train less experienced people safely and support them in practical projects.", "prerequisites": [ "CRAFT-02", "KNOW-04" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "K06" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Kompetenznachweis + Mandat; ggf. beobachtete Praxis", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "CRAFT-14", "branch": "CRAFT", "title": "Quality responsibility", "kind": "role", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Take responsibility for professional quality checks when competence and independence are sufficient.", "prerequisites": [ "CRAFT-02", "KNOW-05" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "W08", "D09" ], "gate": "competence+mandate", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Kompetenznachweis + Mandat; ggf. beobachtete Praxis", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "CREATOR-01", "branch": "CREATOR", "title": "Publish & tell stories", "kind": "skill", "ring": 1, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Publish ideas, art or information clearly.", "prerequisites": [], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "K01", "K03" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "passende Nachweisform" }, { "id": "CREATOR-02", "branch": "CREATOR", "title": "Assess audience feedback", "kind": "skill", "ring": 2, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Distinguish criticism, questions, trolling and genuine signals of harm.", "prerequisites": [ "CREATOR-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "B09", "K03" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "passende Nachweisform" }, { "id": "CREATOR-03", "branch": "CREATOR", "title": "Community-Regeln", "kind": "method", "ring": 2, "scope": [ "person", "community" ], "summary": "Define clear rules for community spaces as interaction grows.", "prerequisites": [ "CREATOR-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "F09", "B09" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "keine persönliche Rangprüfung erforderlich" }, { "id": "CREATOR-04", "branch": "CREATOR", "title": "Delegate moderation", "kind": "office", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "person", "organization" ], "summary": "As interaction increases, establish moderation with limits, escalation and accountability.", "prerequisites": [ "CREATOR-03" ], "triggers": [ "interaction volume exceeds personal capacity to respond", "recurring conflicts", "harassment/spam" ], "book_refs": [ "D09", "T03" ], "gate": "trigger+mandate", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Mandat + erforderliche Kompetenzen; Amt selbst ist kein persönlicher Rang", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "CREATOR-05", "branch": "CREATOR", "title": "Privacy & personal protection", "kind": "capability", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "As visibility grows, systematically strengthen data, safety and boundary protection.", "prerequisites": [ "CREATOR-01" ], "triggers": [ "Doxxing-Risiko", "high visibility", "Team access" ], "book_refs": [ "F04", "T06" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Praxisprüfung / beobachtete Praxis / externer Nachweis je Kontext" }, { "id": "CREATOR-06", "branch": "CREATOR", "title": "Disclose advertising & interests", "kind": "practice", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Make commercial interests, sponsorship and relevant conflicts of interest transparent.", "prerequisites": [ "CREATOR-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "D09", "K03" ], "gate": "law+ethics", "evidence_status": "⚖️ law depending on platform/country + FFE principle", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "keine persönliche Rangprüfung erforderlich" }, { "id": "CREATOR-07", "branch": "CREATOR", "title": "Crisis communication", "kind": "skill", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "person", "organization" ], "summary": "In a public controversy, communicate facts, uncertainty, responsibility and next steps in an orderly way.", "prerequisites": [ "CREATOR-02", "CREATOR-05" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "T02", "K03", "T08" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "passende Nachweisform", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "CREATOR-08", "branch": "CREATOR", "title": "Review the consequences of influence", "kind": "method", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Before major calls to action, consider how reach, fan dynamics or mobilisation could affect others.", "prerequisites": [ "CREATOR-02" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "F08", "F05", "K03" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "keine persönliche Rangprüfung erforderlich" }, { "id": "CREATOR-09", "branch": "CREATOR", "title": "Independent community structures", "kind": "institution", "ring": 5, "scope": [ "person", "community" ], "summary": "With a large, lasting following, establish participation, moderation and independent structures so that everything does not depend on one person.", "prerequisites": [ "CREATOR-04", "CREATOR-08" ], "triggers": [ "a large, lasting community", "one person becomes a bottleneck", "high dependence on personal authority" ], "book_refs": [ "R07", "T04", "R01" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Organisationsreview statt Personenprüfung", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "ENTERPRISE-01", "branch": "ENTERPRISE", "title": "Your own commission", "kind": "capability", "ring": 1, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Clearly establish the commission, service, payment, risk and responsibility.", "prerequisites": [], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "W01", "W05", "W08" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Praxisprüfung / beobachtete Praxis / externer Nachweis je Kontext" }, { "id": "ENTERPRISE-02", "branch": "ENTERPRISE", "title": "Project coordination", "kind": "role", "ring": 2, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Coordinate several contributions, events and handovers for a project.", "prerequisites": [ "ENTERPRISE-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "T03", "T09" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Kompetenznachweis + Mandat; ggf. beobachtete Praxis", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "ENTERPRISE-03", "branch": "ENTERPRISE", "title": "Integrator", "kind": "role", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "project", "organization" ], "summary": "Bring together several independent contributions without automatically gaining authority over personnel.", "prerequisites": [ "ENTERPRISE-02" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "W09", "T09" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Kompetenznachweis + Mandat; ggf. beobachtete Praxis", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "ENTERPRISE-04", "branch": "ENTERPRISE", "title": "Initial responsibility for employees", "kind": "milestone", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "person", "organization" ], "summary": "Once people are employed, treat work organisation, duty of care, pay, time and law as a distinct responsibility.", "prerequisites": [ "ENTERPRISE-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [], "gate": "external-law", "evidence_status": "⚖️ employment/social law depending on country", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "objektiv/transparent definierter Nachweis", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "ENTERPRISE-05", "branch": "ENTERPRISE", "title": "Financial responsibility", "kind": "office", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "organization" ], "summary": "As cash flow grows, define responsibility, approval and oversight traceably.", "prerequisites": [ "ENTERPRISE-02" ], "triggers": [ "increasing volume", "Fonds/Payroll", "several authorised signatories" ], "book_refs": [ "W06", "D09" ], "gate": "trigger+mandate", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Mandat + erforderliche Kompetenzen; Amt selbst ist kein persönlicher Rang", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "ENTERPRISE-06", "branch": "ENTERPRISE", "title": "People-/Personalverantwortung", "kind": "office", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "organization" ], "summary": "With several employees, define responsibility for fair processes, conflicts, development and duties.", "prerequisites": [ "ENTERPRISE-04" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "B02", "K06", "F05" ], "gate": "mandate+law", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Mandat + erforderliche Kompetenzen; Amt selbst ist kein persönlicher Rang", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "ENTERPRISE-07", "branch": "ENTERPRISE", "title": "Review the management layer", "kind": "institution", "ring": 5, "scope": [ "organization" ], "summary": "When direct coordination is no longer sustainable, consider delegation or sub-circles — not automatically more hierarchy.", "prerequisites": [ "ENTERPRISE-03" ], "triggers": [ "Decision bottleneck", "too many direct dependencies", "overload" ], "book_refs": [ "R01", "T04" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Organisationsreview statt Personenprüfung" }, { "id": "ENTERPRISE-08", "branch": "ENTERPRISE", "title": "Audit / independent oversight", "kind": "office", "ring": 5, "scope": [ "organization" ], "summary": "Where power, money or risk are significant, add independent oversight and accountability.", "prerequisites": [ "ENTERPRISE-05" ], "triggers": [ "major resource risk", "Conflicts of interest", "legal obligation" ], "book_refs": [ "D07", "D09", "R09" ], "gate": "risk+mandate/law", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Mandat + erforderliche Kompetenzen; Amt selbst ist kein persönlicher Rang" }, { "id": "CIVIC-01", "branch": "CIVIC", "title": "Understand the mandate", "kind": "knowledge", "ring": 2, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Distinguish what you personally want from what a public or community mandate authorises you to do.", "prerequisites": [], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "D01", "D08" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Teach-back / Wissensnachweis nur falls nötig" }, { "id": "CIVIC-02", "branch": "CIVIC", "title": "Disclose conflicts of interest", "kind": "practice", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Make your own ties visible where they could influence decisions.", "prerequisites": [ "CIVIC-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "D09" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "keine persönliche Rangprüfung erforderlich" }, { "id": "CIVIC-03", "branch": "CIVIC", "title": "Explain publicly", "kind": "skill", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Clearly explain decisions, their factual basis, value judgments and uncertainty.", "prerequisites": [ "CIVIC-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "K02", "K03" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "passende Nachweisform", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "CIVIC-04", "branch": "CIVIC", "title": "Organise participation", "kind": "office", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "person", "community" ], "summary": "Involve those affected early and choose suitable forms of participation.", "prerequisites": [ "CIVIC-03" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "D01", "D02", "D04", "D05" ], "gate": "mandate", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Mandat + erforderliche Kompetenzen; Amt selbst ist kein persönlicher Rang" }, { "id": "CIVIC-05", "branch": "CIVIC", "title": "Include minority protection in the review", "kind": "method", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "person", "community" ], "summary": "For majority decisions, systematically check which groups bear particular consequences.", "prerequisites": [ "CIVIC-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "F05", "F08" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "keine persönliche Rangprüfung erforderlich" }, { "id": "CIVIC-06", "branch": "CIVIC", "title": "Limit the crisis mandate", "kind": "institution", "ring": 5, "scope": [ "community", "organization" ], "summary": "Make emergency powers narrow, reviewable and automatically expiring.", "prerequisites": [ "CIVIC-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "F08", "D08", "T02" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Organisationsreview statt Personenprüfung" }, { "id": "CIVIC-07", "branch": "CIVIC", "title": "Major public impact", "kind": "milestone", "ring": 5, "scope": [ "person", "community" ], "summary": "As the number of people affected grows, duties of transparency, protection and accountability increase.", "prerequisites": [ "CIVIC-03" ], "triggers": [ "broad reach", "strong power over resources", "a broad public mandate" ], "book_refs": [ "D07", "F05", "F08" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "Not a prestige rank: marks a wider scope of responsibility.", "assessment_mode": "objektiv/transparent definierter Nachweis", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "COMM-01", "branch": "COMMUNITY", "title": "Shared action", "kind": "milestone", "ring": 1, "scope": [ "dynasty", "community" ], "summary": "People voluntarily work on a real shared endeavour.", "prerequisites": [], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "B01", "R01" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "objektiv/transparent definierter Nachweis", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "COMM-02", "branch": "COMMUNITY", "title": "Local circle", "kind": "council", "ring": 2, "scope": [ "dynasty", "community" ], "summary": "A small local advisory or decision-making circle with a clear mandate.", "prerequisites": [ "COMM-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "D06", "R01" ], "gate": "local-choice", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Mandat/Verfahrensanforderung statt Rangprüfung", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "COMM-03", "branch": "COMMUNITY", "title": "Commons-Pass", "kind": "method", "ring": 2, "scope": [ "dynasty", "community" ], "summary": "A shared resource receives clear rules for access, maintenance and conflict.", "prerequisites": [ "COMM-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "W03" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "keine persönliche Rangprüfung erforderlich" }, { "id": "COMM-04", "branch": "COMMUNITY", "title": "GEG – shared pot", "kind": "institution", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "dynasty", "community" ], "summary": "Shared funds are managed traceably for agreed purposes.", "prerequisites": [ "COMM-03" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "W06" ], "gate": "economic+legal-design", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Organisationsreview statt Personenprüfung", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "COMM-05", "branch": "COMMUNITY", "title": "Coordination office", "kind": "office", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "dynasty", "community" ], "summary": "Where ongoing coordination is needed, create a clearly limited coordination role.", "prerequisites": [], "triggers": [ "several parallel projects", "recurring coordination bottleneck" ], "book_refs": [ "T09", "R01" ], "gate": "trigger+mandate", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Mandat + erforderliche Kompetenzen; Amt selbst ist kein persönlicher Rang", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "COMM-06", "branch": "COMMUNITY", "title": "Dynasty finance office", "kind": "office", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "dynasty", "community" ], "summary": "Document shared money, authorise spending and report transparently.", "prerequisites": [ "COMM-04" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "W06", "D09" ], "gate": "mandate+law", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Mandat + erforderliche Kompetenzen; Amt selbst ist kein persönlicher Rang", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "COMM-07", "branch": "COMMUNITY", "title": "Conflict circle / conciliation circle", "kind": "council", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "dynasty", "community" ], "summary": "Handle small conflicts through a fair process; no village gossip about absent people.", "prerequisites": [ "COMM-02" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "D06", "B02", "B03", "B09" ], "gate": "due-process", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Mandat/Verfahrensanforderung statt Rangprüfung" }, { "id": "COMM-08", "branch": "COMMUNITY", "title": "Larger council [name open]", "kind": "council", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "dynasty", "community" ], "summary": "Coordinate several sub-circles or larger groups when a local circle is no longer enough.", "prerequisites": [ "COMM-02" ], "triggers": [ "several sub-circles", "need for representation", "local circle overloaded" ], "book_refs": [ "D01", "D05", "R01" ], "gate": "trigger+local-choice", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Mandat/Verfahrensanforderung statt Rangprüfung", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "COMM-09", "branch": "COMMUNITY", "title": "Quality office", "kind": "office", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "dynasty", "community" ], "summary": "Maintain shared quality standards and make responsibility for assessment transparent.", "prerequisites": [ "COMM-05" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "W08", "K05" ], "gate": "competence+mandate", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Mandat + erforderliche Kompetenzen; Amt selbst ist kein persönlicher Rang" }, { "id": "COMM-10", "branch": "COMMUNITY", "title": "Safety office", "kind": "office", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "dynasty", "community" ], "summary": "Where risks are significant, organise protection, stop-the-line and responsibilities.", "prerequisites": [], "triggers": [ "safety-critical work", "repeated incidents", "legal obligation" ], "book_refs": [ "T01", "T02", "T06" ], "gate": "risk/law+competence", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Mandat + erforderliche Kompetenzen; Amt selbst ist kein persönlicher Rang" }, { "id": "COMM-11", "branch": "COMMUNITY", "title": "Mirror council / independent review", "kind": "council", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "community" ], "summary": "Reviews power, offices and drift without becoming an operational government itself.", "prerequisites": [ "COMM-08" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "D07", "R09" ], "gate": "local-choice", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Mandat/Verfahrensanforderung statt Rangprüfung" }, { "id": "COMM-12", "branch": "COMMUNITY", "title": "Dynastie-Verbund", "kind": "institution", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "federation" ], "summary": "Several dynasties build shared interfaces, projects or infrastructure.", "prerequisites": [ "COMM-05" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "R01", "R02" ], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Organisationsreview statt Personenprüfung", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "COMM-13", "branch": "COMMUNITY", "title": "Die Illuminati", "kind": "federation", "ring": 5, "scope": [ "federation" ], "summary": "A federal level between several communities/dynasties for genuinely shared tasks.", "prerequisites": [ "COMM-12" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [ "R02" ], "gate": "federation-choice+law", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "institutionelle Voraussetzungen statt Personenprüfung", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "OMNI-01", "branch": "OMNI", "title": "Breadth profile", "kind": "milestone", "ring": 2, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Visibly document several different skills without making them an overall rating of the person.", "prerequisites": [ "KNOW-03" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "objektiv/transparent definierter Nachweis", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "OMNI-02", "branch": "OMNI", "title": "Pocket of depth", "kind": "milestone", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Develop robust depth in at least one field while openly exploring others.", "prerequisites": [ "OMNI-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "objektiv/transparent definierter Nachweis", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "OMNI-03", "branch": "OMNI", "title": "Connect domains", "kind": "skill", "ring": 3, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Meaningfully combine tools or insights from several disciplines in one project.", "prerequisites": [ "OMNI-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "passende Nachweisform", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "OMNI-04", "branch": "OMNI", "title": "Interdisciplinary integrator", "kind": "role", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Connect people and skills from different domains into a coherent project.", "prerequisites": [ "OMNI-03", "ENTERPRISE-02" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Kompetenznachweis + Mandat; ggf. beobachtete Praxis", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "OMNI-05", "branch": "OMNI", "title": "System builder", "kind": "role", "ring": 5, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Create reusable structures, learning paths or institutions that others can use independently.", "prerequisites": [ "OMNI-04", "KNOW-04" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": true, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "Kompetenznachweis + Mandat; ggf. beobachtete Praxis", "celebration_rule": "only after passing/recognition in an evidence window; celebration voluntary" }, { "id": "OMNI-06", "branch": "OMNI", "title": "Life portfolio", "kind": "method", "ring": 4, "scope": [ "person" ], "summary": "Treat your skills, projects, relationships, responsibilities and learning wishes as a changing portfolio.", "prerequisites": [ "SELF-04", "OMNI-01" ], "triggers": [], "book_refs": [], "gate": "recommendation", "evidence_status": "🧪 draft", "celebration_eligible": false, "notes": "", "assessment_mode": "keine persönliche Rangprüfung erforderlich" } ], "edges": [ { "from": "SELF-01", "to": "SELF-04", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "SELF-01", "to": "SELF-07", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "SOCIAL-01", "to": "SOCIAL-02", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "SOCIAL-02", "to": "SOCIAL-03", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "SOCIAL-01", "to": "SOCIAL-04", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "KNOW-04", "to": "SOCIAL-05", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "SOCIAL-01", "to": "SOCIAL-06", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "KNOW-01", "to": "KNOW-02", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "KNOW-03", "to": "KNOW-04", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "KNOW-03", "to": "KNOW-05", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "KNOW-01", "to": "KNOW-06", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CRAFT-01", "to": "CRAFT-02", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "KNOW-03", "to": "CRAFT-02", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CRAFT-01", "to": "CRAFT-10", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CRAFT-10", "to": "CRAFT-11", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CRAFT-11", "to": "CRAFT-12", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CRAFT-02", "to": "CRAFT-13", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "KNOW-04", "to": "CRAFT-13", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CRAFT-02", "to": "CRAFT-14", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "KNOW-05", "to": "CRAFT-14", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CREATOR-01", "to": "CREATOR-02", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CREATOR-01", "to": "CREATOR-03", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CREATOR-03", "to": "CREATOR-04", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CREATOR-01", "to": "CREATOR-05", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CREATOR-01", "to": "CREATOR-06", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CREATOR-02", "to": "CREATOR-07", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CREATOR-05", "to": "CREATOR-07", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CREATOR-02", "to": "CREATOR-08", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CREATOR-04", "to": "CREATOR-09", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CREATOR-08", "to": "CREATOR-09", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "ENTERPRISE-01", "to": "ENTERPRISE-02", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "ENTERPRISE-02", "to": "ENTERPRISE-03", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "ENTERPRISE-01", "to": "ENTERPRISE-04", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "ENTERPRISE-02", "to": "ENTERPRISE-05", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "ENTERPRISE-04", "to": "ENTERPRISE-06", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "ENTERPRISE-03", "to": "ENTERPRISE-07", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "ENTERPRISE-05", "to": "ENTERPRISE-08", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CIVIC-01", "to": "CIVIC-02", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CIVIC-01", "to": "CIVIC-03", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CIVIC-03", "to": "CIVIC-04", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CIVIC-01", "to": "CIVIC-05", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CIVIC-01", "to": "CIVIC-06", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CIVIC-03", "to": "CIVIC-07", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "COMM-01", "to": "COMM-02", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "COMM-01", "to": "COMM-03", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "COMM-03", "to": "COMM-04", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "COMM-04", "to": "COMM-06", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "COMM-02", "to": "COMM-07", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "COMM-02", "to": "COMM-08", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "COMM-05", "to": "COMM-09", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "COMM-08", "to": "COMM-11", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "COMM-05", "to": "COMM-12", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "COMM-12", "to": "COMM-13", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "KNOW-03", "to": "OMNI-01", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "OMNI-01", "to": "OMNI-02", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "OMNI-01", "to": "OMNI-03", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "OMNI-03", "to": "OMNI-04", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "ENTERPRISE-02", "to": "OMNI-04", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "OMNI-04", "to": "OMNI-05", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "KNOW-04", "to": "OMNI-05", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "SELF-04", "to": "OMNI-06", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "OMNI-01", "to": "OMNI-06", "relation": "prerequisite" }, { "from": "CREATOR-04", "to": "SOCIAL-04", "relation": "recommended-skill" }, { "from": "CREATOR-08", "to": "CIVIC-05", "relation": "related" }, { "from": "CREATOR-09", "to": "COMM-08", "relation": "related" }, { "from": "ENTERPRISE-06", "to": "SOCIAL-04", "relation": "recommended-skill" }, { "from": "ENTERPRISE-08", "to": "COMM-11", "relation": "pattern" }, { "from": "CRAFT-14", "to": "COMM-09", "relation": "scales-to" }, { "from": "KNOW-06", "to": "COMM-05", "relation": "supports" }, { "from": "CIVIC-04", "to": "COMM-08", "relation": "supports" }, { "from": "COMM-13", "to": "CIVIC-04", "relation": "supports" }, { "from": "OMNI-05", "to": "COMM-12", "relation": "can-support" } ], "tool_templates": [ { "id": "TOOL-RED", "name": "Talking stone", "type": "method", "use": "Organise speaking time and listening", "book_refs": [ "D04" ] }, { "id": "TOOL-STACHEL", "name": "Stachelrunde", "type": "method", "use": "Explicitly invite opposing positions", "book_refs": [ "D04" ] }, { "id": "TOOL-LOYAL", "name": "Loyaler Stachel", "type": "role", "use": "Institutionalise benevolent, genuine dissent", "book_refs": [ "D04" ] }, { "id": "TOOL-HOF", "name": "Hofnarr", "type": "role", "use": "Challenge power and overconfidence with humour", "book_refs": [ "D07" ] }, { "id": "TOOL-NEIN", "name": "Nein-Kosten-Test", "type": "test", "use": "Check whether participation is truly voluntary", "book_refs": [ "F02", "B06" ] }, { "id": "TOOL-COMMONS", "name": "Commons-Pass", "type": "method", "use": "Give a shared resource clear rules", "book_refs": [ "W03" ] }, { "id": "TOOL-TEACH", "name": "Teach-back", "type": "method", "use": "Check understanding in practice", "book_refs": [ "K04" ] }, { "id": "TOOL-PREMORTEM", "name": "Premortem / future funeral", "type": "game", "use": "Explore possible failures before a project", "book_refs": [ "K07", "T02" ] }, { "id": "TOOL-POST", "name": "Postmortem", "type": "method", "use": "Learn systemically after events", "book_refs": [ "T08" ] }, { "id": "TOOL-BUS", "name": "Bus-Test", "type": "test", "use": "Identify dependence on individuals", "book_refs": [ "T04", "R07" ] }, { "id": "TOOL-POWER", "name": "Power map", "type": "method", "use": "Make formal and informal power visible", "book_refs": [ "D07" ] }, { "id": "TOOL-RULE", "name": "Rule tribunal / Rule Court", "type": "game", "use": "keep, repair, test or bury a rule", "book_refs": [ "R08" ] }, { "id": "TOOL-DEAD", "name": "Day of dead rules", "type": "ritual", "use": "Retire outdated rules together", "book_refs": [ "R08", "R10" ] }, { "id": "TOOL-CONST", "name": "Constitution Day", "type": "ritual", "use": "Review rights, power, mission and rules together", "book_refs": [ "R10" ] }, { "id": "TOOL-REPAIR", "name": "Restitution ritual", "type": "ritual", "use": "Voluntary symbolic repair and reintegration", "book_refs": [ "B03", "B06" ] } ], "office_templates": [ { "id": "OFF-COORD", "name": "Coordination", "triggers": [ "parallel projects", "Coordination bottleneck" ], "core": "Coordinate dates, interfaces and next steps", "limits": "no automatic authority over personnel", "book_refs": [ "T09", "W09" ] }, { "id": "OFF-FIN", "name": "Finance / treasury", "triggers": [ "shared pot", "significant cash flow" ], "core": "Manage money movements, approvals and reports", "limits": "Separate oversight from execution where risk is high", "book_refs": [ "W06", "D09" ] }, { "id": "OFF-QUAL", "name": "Quality", "triggers": [ "shared brand", "repeated quality deviations", "safety-relevant service" ], "core": "Maintain standards, assessments and improvements", "limits": "demonstrate professional competence", "book_refs": [ "W08", "K05" ] }, { "id": "OFF-SAFE", "name": "Safety", "triggers": [ "dangerous work", "critical infrastructure", "repeated incidents" ], "core": "Organise stop-the-line, protective measures and learning from incidents", "limits": "no safety argument used as a blanket claim to power", "book_refs": [ "T01", "T02", "F08" ] }, { "id": "OFF-DATA", "name": "Data & privacy", "triggers": [ "sensitive data", "several administrators", "a large public audience" ], "core": "Organise access, data minimisation and protection", "limits": "no Community Stasi", "book_refs": [ "F04", "T06" ] }, { "id": "OFF-MOD", "name": "Moderation", "triggers": [ "high interaction volume", "recurring community conflicts" ], "core": "Moderate community spaces and limit escalation", "limits": "transparent rules, an open complaints route", "book_refs": [ "D09", "B09" ] }, { "id": "OFF-LEARN", "name": "Learning & mentoring", "triggers": [ "many learners", "knowledge is concentrated in a few people" ], "core": "Organise mentoring, Angeberscheine and knowledge sharing", "limits": "mentor status is not political power", "book_refs": [ "K05", "K06" ] }, { "id": "OFF-EXT", "name": "External representation", "triggers": [ "Contracts", "Authorities", "Partnerships" ], "core": "Speak or act externally within the mandate", "limits": "symbolic role ≠ legal power of representation", "book_refs": [ "D08", "W09" ] }, { "id": "OFF-CONFLICT", "name": "Conflict facilitation / conciliation", "triggers": [ "recurring deadlocked conflicts" ], "core": "Enable fair clarification and voluntary mediation", "limits": "no gossip tribunal, no forced reconciliation", "book_refs": [ "D06", "B02", "B03" ] }, { "id": "OFF-AUDIT", "name": "Mirror / audit", "triggers": [ "Concentration of power", "large cash flow", "Drift" ], "core": "Independently review whether roles and institutions serve their purpose", "limits": "no shadow government", "book_refs": [ "D07", "R09" ] }, { "id": "OFF-KNOW", "name": "Knowledge steward", "triggers": [ "Knowledge loss", "many sources/contact people" ], "core": "Keep who-knows-what and sources up to date", "limits": "no monopoly on truth", "book_refs": [ "K09", "K10" ] } ] }, "legal_sources": [ { "id": "SRC-GENG-1-CURRENT", "url": "https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/geng/__1.html", "verified": "2026-09-16" }, { "id": "SRC-GENG-17-CURRENT", "url": "https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/geng/__17.html", "verified": "2026-09-16" }, { "id": "SRC-GENG-24-CURRENT", "url": "https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/geng/__24.html", "verified": "2026-09-16" }, { "id": "SRC-BGB-611A-CURRENT", "url": "https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb/__611a.html", "verified": "2026-09-16" }, { "id": "SRC-SGB4-7-CURRENT", "url": "https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/sgb_4/__7.html", "verified": "2026-09-16" }, { "id": "SRC-DRV-STATUS-2026", "url": "https://www.deutsche-rentenversicherung.de/DRV/DE/Rente/Arbeitnehmer-und-Selbststaendige/03_Selbststaendige/statusfeststellungsverfahren", "verified": "2026-09-16" }, { "id": "SRC-BBIG-10-CURRENT", "url": "https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bbig_2005/__10.html", "verified": "2026-09-16" }, { "id": "SRC-AUEG-1-CURRENT", "url": "https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/a_g/__1.html", "verified": "2026-09-16" }, { "id": "SRC-SCHWARZARBG-1-CURRENT", "url": "https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/schwarzarbg_2004/BJNR184210004.html", "verified": "2026-09-16" }, { "id": "SRC-ESTG-8-CURRENT", "url": "https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/estg/__8.html", "verified": "2026-09-16" }, { "id": "SRC-USTG-3-CURRENT", "url": "https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/ustg_1980/__3.html", "verified": "2026-09-16" }, { "id": "SRC-USTG-10-CURRENT", "url": "https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/ustg_1980/__10.html", "verified": "2026-09-16" }, { "id": "SRC-ZAG-1-CURRENT", "url": "https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/zag_2018/__1.html", "verified": "2026-09-16" } ], "archive_routing": { "part_iv_status": "historical_only", "normative_priority": "Part II, then current Part III modules", "rule": "Do not route archived claims as current rules without explicit archive request." }, "pre_statute_state": { "ready_for_statute_draft": true, "politically_final": false, "reader_review_complete": false, "known_depth_backlog": [ "website/app implementation" ], "h002_complete": true, "h004_complete": true }, "statute_candidates": { "core": [ "F01", "F02", "F03", "F05", "F06", "F08", "F09", "D02", "D08", "D09", "D10", "W07", "B01", "B04" ], "possible_reference_only": [ "D03", "R01", "R02", "W02", "W06" ], "keep_in_orders_or_culture": [ "D04", "D05", "D06", "D07", "W01", "W03", "W04", "W05", "K05", "K10", "R10", "M08" ] }, "operational_profiles": [ { "id": "OP-F01", "core_id": "F01", "title": "Grundrechte-Charta", "activate_when": "a rule, sanction, allocation or decision could affect fundamental rights, membership rights or essential access", "goal": "identify affected rights early and prevent majorities, status, capital or technology from bypassing the protected core", "must_check": [ "Who specifically is affected?", "Which fundamental right or membership right is affected?", "What legal/normative basis supports the interference?", "Is there a less restrictive, equally effective approach?", "What routes exist for complaint, protection and review?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Fundamental rights also apply to unpopular people and minorities.", "Mojo, capital, expertise or popularity must not buy fundamental rights.", "Urgent measures must remain narrow, time-limited and reviewable." ], "recommended_path": [ "Sachverhalt und Betroffene klären", "betroffene Rechte markieren", "F08-Verhältnismäßigkeit prüfen", "mildeste tragfähige Lösung wählen", "Rechtsbehelf und Review dokumentieren" ], "tools": [ "Grundrechts-Check", "F08 Proportionality", "K02 Decision brief", "D06 Fundamental rights council" ], "culture": "No cultural practice may qualify the core of fundamental rights.", "cross_checks": "F02 Non-participation · F03 Exit · F04 Privacy · F05 Minority protection · F08 Proportionality · D06 Fundamental rights council", "failure_modes": [ "**Rights inflation:** Everything becomes a fundamental right.", "**Rule by judges:** Oversight bodies write policy.", "**Popularity-based rights:** Unpopular people receive less protection in practice.", "**Paper rights:** Rights exist, but nobody knows about or can access them." ], "escalation": "Where there is a credible serious fundamental rights violation, external law or an urgent need for protection, escalate immediately to the responsible council/specialist body.", "output": "Fundamental rights review with facts, affected rights, permitted options, protective measures and review.", "norm_status": "✅ political core of fundamental rights adopted · 🟡 later additions possible · ⚖️ legal embedding later" }, { "id": "OP-F02", "core_id": "F02", "title": "Right not to participate", "activate_when": "participation, an event, ritual, community work, visibility or loyalty is described as voluntary", "goal": "ensure genuine voluntariness and make the real costs of saying no visible", "must_check": [ "Is the activity mandatory, voluntary or private?", "What does a person lose in practice by saying no?", "Does saying no affect commissions, status, Mojo, access or belonging?", "Is there a neutral path for non-participation?", "Must saying no be justified publicly?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No disadvantage for declining voluntary cultural activities.", "No hidden obligation through status, friendship or economic power.", "Contracts and safety duties remain honestly identified as obligations." ], "recommended_path": [ "Modus klassifizieren", "Nein-Kosten-Test durchführen", "gleichwertige Alternative oder Opt-out schaffen", "Machtverflechtungen prüfen", "Folgen nach der Anwendung beobachten" ], "tools": [ "Nein-Kosten-Test", "B06 Freedom of ritual", "W05 Working-mode card", "F05 Equal treatment" ], "culture": "A voluntary ritual may be beautiful and connecting, but must never become a test of belonging.", "cross_checks": "F01 Fundamental rights · B06 Freedom of ritual · B07 Multiple affiliations · W05 Working modes · B01 Admission", "failure_modes": [ "obligation through peer pressure", "Mojo as an attendance bonus", "“voluntary” compulsory shifts", "Introvertierten-Nachteil" ], "escalation": "If saying no leads to economic, social or legal disadvantages, also review F05/D09/D06.", "output": "Participation card: mode, costs of saying no, alternative, responsible people and review.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 costs-of-saying-no pilot · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-F03", "core_id": "F03", "title": "Exit & portability", "activate_when": "a person wants to leave a project, office, dynasty, membership or data/customer relationship", "goal": "enable a dignified, legally sound exit with portability and a clear handover", "must_check": [ "Which contracts and obligations are ongoing?", "Which data, skills, evidence and personal content are portable?", "Which commons, customer or brand rights are affected?", "Which access permissions must end?", "What transitional or alumni relationship is desired?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Leaving is not betrayal.", "No data hostage, skill hostage or eternal tithe.", "Third-party rights, ongoing contracts and duties of protection remain in force." ], "recommended_path": [ "Exit-Inventar erstellen", "Verträge und offene Pflichten klären", "Daten/Nachweise exportieren", "Zugriffe und Vertretung geordnet übergeben", "Alumni-/Kooperationspfad anbieten", "Abschluss bestätigen" ], "tools": [ "Exit-Checkliste", "W03 Commons pass", "W10 Customer pool", "T03 Handoff" ], "culture": "A dignified farewell or handover ritual is possible, but voluntary.", "cross_checks": "B01 Admission · W10 Customer pool · K05 Angeberschein · T05 Access power · R03 Friendly separation", "failure_modes": [ "Platform Lock-in", "customers as “property”", "Skill-Geisel", "Data Hostage" ], "escalation": "For disputes over assets, contracts, customer data or membership, involve external legal/specialist advice.", "output": "Exit dossier with obligations, exports, handovers, access termination and completion date.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · 🟡 formal eG exit parameters in the articles of association · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-F04", "core_id": "F04", "title": "Privacy & data autonomy", "activate_when": "data is to be collected, combined, analysed, shared or used for matching/AI", "goal": "ensure data sovereignty, purpose limitation and minimal informational power", "must_check": [ "What specific purpose justifies each field?", "What legal basis/consent exists?", "Who can access it and why?", "How long is it stored?", "Which combination creates sensitive profiles?", "How do information access, export, withdrawal of consent and deletion work?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No secret social or trust scores.", "Data minimisation before technical convenience.", "Do not feed conflict, health or relationship data into marketplace rankings." ], "recommended_path": [ "Dateninventar erstellen", "Zweck und Rechtsgrundlage je Feld festlegen", "minimieren/pseudonymisieren", "Zugriffs- und Löschregeln bauen", "Bedrohungs-/Missbrauchstest", "Privacy-Review vor Verknüpfung" ], "tools": [ "Data Inventory", "Privacy-by-Design", "T05 Access power", "T06 Threat Model" ], "culture": "No cultural obligation to disclose personal areas of life.", "cross_checks": "K10 Rubin AI · T05 Access power · T06 Cybersecurity · B04 Rehabilitation · D07 Power map", "failure_modes": [ "Data Creep", "Consent Theater", "Social Scoring", "AI-driven change of purpose" ], "escalation": "For highly sensitive data, extensive profiling or external sharing, trigger specialist data protection review/DPIA.", "output": "Data protection factsheet with purpose, fields, access, retention period, data subject rights and fallback.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 data inventory/privacy pilot · ⚖️ GDPR/legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-F05", "core_id": "F05", "title": "Equal treatment & minority protection", "activate_when": "admission, opportunities, resources, sanctions, visibility or procedures are distributed differently", "goal": "ensure fair criteria, minority protection and protection for socially vulnerable or unpopular people too", "must_check": [ "What criteria apply, and were they published in advance?", "Which groups bear particular disadvantages?", "Is there indirect disadvantage or a clique effect?", "Are barrier removal or reasonable accommodations needed?", "Is there a review/complaint route?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No disadvantage based on protected or irrelevant characteristics.", "Unpopularity is not grounds for exclusion.", "A majority replaces neither fundamental rights nor fair process." ], "recommended_path": [ "Kriterien offenlegen", "Auswirkungs- und Außenseiterperspektive prüfen", "wo sinnvoll blind/semi-blind bewerten", "Barrieren reduzieren", "Entscheidung begründen", "Review ermöglichen" ], "tools": [ "Outsider/minority protection test", "Criteria card", "D09 Conflicts of interest", "F08 Proportionality" ], "culture": "Local culture may be diverse, but must not create a second membership system.", "cross_checks": "F01 Fundamental rights · D06 Fundamental rights council · D09 Conflicts of interest · B01 Admission · W01 Marketplace", "failure_modes": [ "equality = sameness", "“merit” without defined criteria", "friendship as a hidden criterion", "a protected category becomes a ranking of people" ], "escalation": "For structural discrimination, conflicts involving fundamental rights or external AGG/legal issues, escalate to a specialist body/council.", "output": "Fairness review with criteria, effects, protective measures and a complaints route.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 process pilot · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-F06", "core_id": "F06", "title": "Mission", "activate_when": "a new business area, project, growth step, capital offer or major system is proposed", "goal": "check whether the activity actually strengthens FFE freedom, shared infrastructure and societal benefit", "must_check": [ "What freedom/capability is created?", "What shared infrastructure is created?", "Who bears costs and external effects?", "What dependence or concentration of power is created?", "Which alternative fulfils the mission better?", "How will we recognise mission drift?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "The mission does not justify fundamental rights violations.", "The business model can be changed; the purpose cannot be changed secretly.", "Growth is not an end in itself." ], "recommended_path": [ "Missionshypothese formulieren", "F07/F08-Schutzcheck", "Nutzen/Kosten/Abhängigkeit vergleichen", "Mission-Metrik plus Gegenmetrik festlegen", "Pilot/Sunset/Review bestimmen" ], "tools": [ "R05 Mission balance sheet", "K02 Decision brief", "K07 Premortem", "D07 Power map" ], "culture": "Stories and symbols may carry the mission, but must not replace criticism.", "cross_checks": "F07 Negative mission · W02 Tithe · W04 Infrastructure · R04 Growth · R05 Mission balance sheet", "failure_modes": [ "**Mission washing:** Fine language without impact.", "**Mission drift:** Gradual shifts driven by money/incentives.", "**Mission purity:** Every pragmatic concession is seen as betrayal.", "**Founder mission:** A historical founder preference becomes permanent." ], "escalation": "Where goals conflict with fundamental rights, external law or funding essential to survival, involve the whole community/specialist review.", "output": "Mission-fit brief with benefits, risks, alternatives, metrics and review.", "norm_status": "✅ mission adopted · 🟡 later editorial refinement possible" }, { "id": "OP-F07", "core_id": "F07", "title": "Negative mission / anti-cult limits", "activate_when": "exclusive loyalty, founder worship, information isolation or ever greater personal sacrifices are expected", "goal": "identify totalising or cult-like dynamics early and limit them institutionally", "must_check": [ "Can people disagree?", "Is exit realistic?", "Do external contacts and multiple affiliations remain protected?", "Do the rules also apply to leaders?", "Who can complain or review independently?", "Are private relationships politically controlled?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No loyalty oaths to individuals.", "No control of private relationships/information.", "Criticism and external contacts remain legitimate." ], "recommended_path": [ "Frühwarnzeichen dokumentieren", "unabhängige Macht-/Rechteprüfung", "Abhängigkeiten und Informationsmonopole reduzieren", "Beschwerde/Exit stärken", "gegebenenfalls externe Prüfung" ], "tools": [ "Anti-Katechismus-Test", "Exit-Voice-Check", "D07 Power map", "Mirror council" ], "culture": "Strong culture is allowed; admiration must remain voluntary and never become an obligation to obey.", "cross_checks": "F02 Non-participation · F03 Exit · F04 Privacy · B06 Freedom of ritual · B07 Multiple affiliations · R07 Founder dependence", "failure_modes": [ "anti-cult rhetoric itself becomes a claim to moral superiority", "every strong emotion is treated as suspicious", "criticism of the founder is permitted only symbolically", "“voluntary” with high costs for saying no" ], "escalation": "For abuse of power, intimidation, isolation or severe dependence, involve an independent/external protection body.", "output": "Anti-totalising report with warning signs, countermeasures, responsibility and review.", "norm_status": "✅ protective core adopted · 🔬 ongoing experience/research review" }, { "id": "OP-F08", "core_id": "F08", "title": "Proportionality", "activate_when": "an obligation, restriction, sanction, safety measure or emergency rule is introduced", "goal": "allow only suitable, necessary and minimally restrictive interventions", "must_check": [ "What legitimate objective or specific harm?", "Is the measure suitable?", "Is there a less restrictive, equally effective means?", "Who bears the side effects?", "How long does it apply?", "How can it be revoked or challenged?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Convenience is not an emergency.", "The core of fundamental rights and mandatory law retain priority.", "Scope, duration and oversight must be proportional." ], "recommended_path": [ "Gefahr/Ziel konkretisieren", "Alternativen vergleichen", "kleinsten ausreichenden Scope wählen", "Sunset/Review/Rechtsbehelf setzen", "Wirkung und Nebenwirkung messen" ], "tools": [ "Proportionality review", "T01 Safety Stop", "D10 High thresholds", "K07 Review" ], "culture": "Symbolic sanctions must not be harsher than objectively necessary.", "cross_checks": "F01 Fundamental rights · D06 Fundamental rights council · B02 Repair ladder · T01 Safety stop", "failure_modes": [ "Purpose Laundering", "“suitable” = conceivable in some way", "a less restrictive alternative was not seriously considered", "appropriateness is merely asserted" ], "escalation": "For substantial interference with fundamental rights, external legal issues or immediate danger, involve the responsible specialist/fundamental rights council.", "output": "Proportionality note with objective, alternatives, scope, deadline and review.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-F09", "core_id": "F09", "title": "Access to law and rules", "activate_when": "a binding rule is to be created, changed, interpreted or applied", "goal": "ensure that rules are findable, understandable, versioned and clear about jurisdiction", "must_check": [ "Which current version applies?", "Who adopted it?", "To whom does it apply, and from when?", "Where are the short and full versions?", "Which higher norm limits it?", "How can it be challenged or changed?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No secret binding rules.", "AI must not be the only route to access the law.", "Old versions are archived, not presented as current." ], "recommended_path": [ "Normebene bestimmen", "Kurzfassung plus Volltext erstellen", "Version/Datum/Zuständigkeit ergänzen", "veröffentlichen und Betroffene informieren", "Archiv/Änderungslog pflegen", "Nutzertest durchführen" ], "tools": [ "Rule card", "Shared current version", "Information diet", "Change log" ], "culture": "Cultural rules are marked as culture and are not secretly made legally enforceable.", "cross_checks": "D08 Norm architecture · K10 Rubin AI · R06 Bureaucracy radar · T10 Fallback · K02 Decision brief", "failure_modes": [ "a rule exists only in a chat", "an AI answer becomes a new norm", "two “current” PDFs", "summary contradicts full text" ], "escalation": "For conflicting norms, D08; for legal uncertainty, specialist review; for unclear communication, a reader/user test.", "output": "Publishable rule card with rank, scope, version, summary, full text and remedy.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 reader/user tests · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-D01", "core_id": "D01", "title": "Affectedness & subsidiarity", "activate_when": "it is unclear which person, project, dynasty or higher level should decide", "goal": "place decisions as locally as possible, with full capacity to take responsibility and protection for affected outsiders", "must_check": [ "Who bears the consequences?", "Which level has the knowledge and resources?", "Are there spillovers onto other groups?", "Are fundamental rights or shared interfaces affected?", "Can the local level bear and correct the consequences?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "As local as sensible, as shared as necessary.", "Local autonomy must not ignore fundamental rights or external effects.", "A higher level receives only justified, enumerated responsibilities." ], "recommended_path": [ "Betroffenheitskarte erstellen", "Kompetenz und Spillover prüfen", "kleinste tragfähige Ebene wählen", "Schnittstellen/Appeal definieren", "nach Anwendung reviewen" ], "tools": [ "Jurisdiction ladder", "D07 Power map", "F01 Fundamental rights", "R02 Federation" ], "culture": "Local communities may freely design their form; interfaces remain compatible.", "cross_checks": "D06 Jurisdiction council · R01 Dynasties · R02 Federation · F01 Fundamental rights", "failure_modes": [ "**Affectedness inflation:** Everyone claims to be affected by everything.", "**Local feudalism:** Groups abuse autonomy.", "**Centralisation reflex:** Every interface is moved upwards.", "**Resource trap:** Local responsibility without resources." ], "escalation": "For disputes over competence, D06 Jurisdiction council; for several communities, R02 level.", "output": "Jurisdiction memo with affected people, decision level, limits, interfaces and review.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 jurisdiction cases · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-D02", "core_id": "D02", "title": "Voting architecture", "activate_when": "a binding vote, election, prioritisation or budget decision is being prepared", "goal": "choose a clear procedure suited to the type of decision before the outcome is known", "must_check": [ "What is being decided?", "One or several solutions/seats?", "How significant and reversible is the decision?", "Who is particularly affected?", "What legal requirement or provision in the articles of association applies?", "What level of complexity does the group understand?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Set the procedure before the outcome.", "One basic political vote per member.", "A majority must not override fundamental rights.", "Credits, capital or Mojo do not buy a core vote." ], "recommended_path": [ "K02-Entscheidungsbrief erstellen", "Entscheidungstyp mit Kompass klassifizieren", "Methodenkarte aus M12 wählen", "Verfahren vorher erklären/testen", "Abstimmung nachvollziehbar durchführen", "Ergebnis und Minderheitenbericht dokumentieren" ], "tools": [ "Entscheidungsverfahren-Kompass", "M12 Method library", "D04 Deliberation", "D10 High threshold" ], "culture": "Schützenfest can be a limited governance pilot; the legally effective vote remains separate.", "cross_checks": "D04 Deliberation · D05 Sortition councils · D10 Constitutional amendment · K02 Decision brief · W07 Capital & investors", "failure_modes": [ "Method Shopping", "Capital-based votes", "Mojo-Stimmen", "election rules set only after polling" ], "escalation": "For votes under the articles of association, elections to governing bodies, legal requirements or matters close to fundamental rights, involve legal review or D10.", "output": "Voting plan with Method-ID, justification, voting rules, counting, protection and minutes.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · ✅ method library v1.0 · 🧪 method pilots · ⚖️ articles/election-law gate" }, { "id": "OP-D03", "core_id": "D03", "title": "Caesar – founder's dignity, right to be heard & representation", "activate_when": "Rubin as Caesar wishes to be heard in a decision or to represent FFE culturally/diplomatically", "goal": "make room for the founder's knowledge and symbolism without transferring democratic decision-making power", "must_check": [ "Has Caesar explicitly invoked the right to be heard?", "When can a fair hearing take place without delay?", "Should Caesar speak before or after independent opinions are formed?", "Is this only cultural representation, or legal representation?", "What conflicts of interest exist?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No veto, no additional vote, no power to issue instructions.", "No entitlement to unlimited speaking time or delay.", "Without a mandate, cultural representation is not legal representation." ], "recommended_path": [ "Anhörungswunsch aufnehmen", "angemessenen Slot setzen", "wo sinnvoll unabhängige Positionen vorab sichern", "Caesar-Beitrag dokumentieren", "normal entscheiden", "Repräsentationsmandat separat prüfen" ], "tools": [ "Caesar hearing", "D04 Deliberation", "D07 Power map", "Minority report" ], "culture": "Honours, history and diplomatic travel are culturally possible; legendary status remains voluntary.", "cross_checks": "D04 Deliberation · D07 Power map · F07 Anti-totalising limits · R07 Founder dependence · K10 Rubin AI", "failure_modes": [ "**Founder worship:** Criticism of Rubin becomes culturally taboo.", "**Soft veto:** Nobody disagrees, although no formal veto exists.", "**Endless hearing:** Speaking rights become a delaying tactic.", "**Court entourage:** Closeness to Caesar becomes a resource for access or status." ], "escalation": "For embedding in the articles of association, powers of representation or a serious power conflict, involve legal review/the mirror council.", "output": "Hearing record: request, time, contribution, limits, decision and representation mandate.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · ⚖️ legal gate if embedded in the articles of association" }, { "id": "OP-D04", "core_id": "D04", "title": "Deliberation before decision", "activate_when": "a complex, contentious or highly consequential decision needs discussion before the vote", "goal": "enable shared understanding, genuine counterarguments and informed personal positions", "must_check": [ "Which facts are agreed, and which disputed?", "Which values are in conflict?", "Which affected people are missing?", "Who dominates speaking time/the agenda?", "Which alternatives and objections have not yet been heard?", "When has there been enough discussion?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Deliberation replaces neither fundamental rights nor a decision by the competent body.", "No forced consensus.", "Silence does not automatically count as consent." ], "recommended_path": [ "K02-Brief verteilen", "individuelle stille Position bilden", "Redestein-/Rundenformat", "Loyalen Stachel/Gegenargument aktivieren", "Optionen verbessern", "Zusammenfassung und offenes Dissensbild", "D02-Verfahren starten" ], "tools": [ "Talking stone", "Stachelrunde", "Loyaler Stachel", "Hofnarr", "A minute of silence" ], "culture": "Humour and rituals may ease tension, but must not ridicule anyone.", "cross_checks": "K02 Decision brief · K03 Fact–forecast–value · D05 Sortition councils · D02 Voting architecture · D03 Caesar · K07 Decision journal", "failure_modes": [ "Meetingocracy", "Expert Theater", "Consensus Pressure", "Debate Club Dominance" ], "escalation": "For safety, fundamental rights or unequal power, escalate to D06/D07/F01.", "output": "Deliberation report with facts, values, options, objections, changes and remaining dissent.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 format pilot · 🔬 research" }, { "id": "OP-D05", "core_id": "D05", "title": "Sortition councils / mini-publics", "activate_when": "an independent advisory/review group is needed and elections/availability always favour the same people", "goal": "broaden temporary participation through a suitable volunteer pool and random selection", "must_check": [ "What is the mandate?", "Who belongs in the selection pool?", "Which groups/barriers are missing?", "What training and information does the council need?", "What additional expertise is needed?", "How can the mandate remain short and reviewable?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Participation is voluntary and supported.", "Random selection does not replace required professional qualifications.", "No hidden agenda or manipulated pool formation." ], "recommended_path": [ "Mandat/Scope definieren", "zugänglichen Pool aufbauen", "transparent auslosen", "Training/Briefing", "deliberieren und dokumentieren", "Mandat beenden und evaluieren" ], "tools": [ "Schützenfest", "Sortition council", "K02 Brief", "D04 Deliberation" ], "culture": "The pilot may develop its own playful culture; selection and decision rules remain transparent.", "cross_checks": "D04 Deliberation · D02 Voting · D06 Rights/jurisdiction · K02 Decision brief · R09 Organisation check", "failure_modes": [ "Lottery Theater", "Pool Bias", "Expert Capture", "Moderator Capture" ], "escalation": "For a statutory body, professional duty or conflict over representation, involve D02/legal review.", "output": "Sortition council dossier with pool, draw, mandate, briefing, outcome and evaluation.", "norm_status": "✅ methodological direction adopted · 🧪 Schützenfest/sortition council pilot · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-D06", "core_id": "D06", "title": "Conflict, fundamental rights & jurisdiction council", "activate_when": "a conflict, alleged fundamental rights violation or jurisdiction dispute cannot be resolved informally", "goal": "choose the right mode and resolve it fairly, proportionately and with minimal data", "must_check": [ "Is this a relationship conflict, fundamental rights issue or jurisdiction matter?", "Is there immediate danger or an imbalance of power?", "Who must be heard?", "Who has a conflict of interest?", "What publicity is truly necessary?", "Are remedies available?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "With people, not about people.", "No forced mediation or reconciliation.", "No judgment based on rumour alone.", "Private matters stay within the smallest possible circle." ], "recommended_path": [ "Triage und Safety", "Modus/Zuständigkeit bestimmen", "Befangenheit prüfen", "Parteien informieren/anhören", "Entscheidung oder Reparaturweg begründen", "Rechtsmittel und Review" ], "tools": [ "Local circle", "Talking stone", "B02 Repair ladder", "B03 Restitution", "D09 Conflicts of interest" ], "culture": "Local communities may culturally design their council, location, symbols and voluntary rituals; the procedural core remains firm.", "cross_checks": "F01 Fundamental rights · F08 Proportionality · D01 Subsidiarity · B02 Repair ladder · B03 Restorative justice · B04 Rehabilitation · D09 Conflicts of interest", "failure_modes": [ "**Tribunal inflation:** Every conflict becomes a formal case.", "**Rule by Judges:** the council replaces political decision-making.", "**Clique Capture:** the same people control complaints.", "**Forum shopping:** Participants seek the most favourable mode." ], "escalation": "For violence, criminal offences, external legal questions, urgent safety concerns or serious fundamental rights issues, involve a specialist/protection body immediately.", "output": "Reasoned conflict/fundamental rights/jurisdiction decision with protection, conditions, remedies and review.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 case pilot · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-D07", "core_id": "D07", "title": "Power map & mirror council", "activate_when": "a role, platform, resource, person or institution could gain disproportionate influence", "goal": "make formal and informal power visible and build appropriate controls", "must_check": [ "Which decisions, resources, data, access and agenda does the source of power control?", "Who is dependent?", "What countervailing power or transparency exists?", "How easy is exit?", "How can abuse be identified and corrected?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No comprehensive friendship graph by default.", "Power analysis must not itself become surveillance.", "Mojo/status is a source of power, but not a judgment of a person's worth." ], "recommended_path": [ "Machtquellen inventarisieren", "Risiko und Betroffene kartieren", "Kontrollen/Rotation/zweiten Stuhl festlegen", "angemessen veröffentlichen", "Spiegelrat/Review aktivieren" ], "tools": [ "Power map", "Mirror council", "Second chair", "Community check" ], "culture": "The Hofnarr and Loyaler Stachel can provide cultural counter-power, but do not replace formal controls.", "cross_checks": "D03 Caesar · D09 Conflict of interest · T07 Network resilience · W07 Investors · R07 Founder dependence · R09 Organisation check", "failure_modes": [ "**Social credit:** People become scores.", "**Power hunting:** Every form of expertise is treated as suspicious.", "**Blind spot:** Informal friendship/patronage power goes unrecorded.", "**Mirror council oligarchy:** Those overseeing others become unchecked themselves." ], "escalation": "For powers over sanctions, personnel, money, root access or fundamental rights, trigger strong oversight/external review.", "output": "Power-control matrix with sources, risks, counter-power, transparency and review.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 power map/mirror council pilot" }, { "id": "OP-D08", "core_id": "D08", "title": "Norm architecture", "activate_when": "a new norm, framework, method or cultural practice is created or changed", "goal": "clearly establish normative rank, jurisdiction, amendability and conflict rules", "must_check": [ "Is it a fundamental right, constitutional principle, articles of association, regulation, method, soft law, culture or experiment?", "Who may adopt/change it?", "Who does it apply to?", "Which higher norm limits it?", "How is it published and reviewed?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "A lower norm must not override a higher norm.", "Culture does not secretly become mandatory.", "An experiment is not presented as law in force." ], "recommended_path": [ "Normtyp bestimmen", "Kompetenz/Zuständigkeit prüfen", "Konflikte mit höherem Recht prüfen", "Beschlussverfahren wählen", "veröffentlichen/versionieren", "Review/Abschaffung festlegen" ], "tools": [ "Norm map", "F09 Rule Card", "D10 Amendment ladder", "Soft-Law-Test" ], "culture": "Cultural names and rituals are permitted if their legal status remains honestly identified.", "cross_checks": "F01 Fundamental rights · D10 Constitutional amendment · K01 Evidence system · R08 Lifecycle", "failure_modes": [ "**Legal fog:** Nobody understands the levels.", "**Soft-law coercion:** An allegedly voluntary guideline is mandatory in practice.", "**Rule evasion:** Power is deliberately hidden in “methods” to avoid oversight.", "**Overloaded articles:** Every detail becomes a matter for notarisation." ], "escalation": "For articles of association, external law or conflicting norms, trigger legal/specialist review.", "output": "Norm factsheet with rank, adoption authority, applicability, conflict rule, amendment and review.", "norm_status": "✅ norm architecture adopted · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-D09", "core_id": "D09", "title": "Conflict of interest & recusal", "activate_when": "a decision-maker has their own financial, personal, family, political or organisational interests", "goal": "make conflicts of interest visible and protect trust through appropriate mitigation", "must_check": [ "What interest exists?", "Could it influence the outcome or perceptions?", "Is disclosure enough, or is abstention/recusal needed?", "Who takes over instead?", "How is this documented without unnecessary disclosure of private matters?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No secret relevant interests.", "Disclosure is not punished.", "A conflicted person does not decide on their own conflict of interest alone." ], "recommended_path": [ "Interesse offenlegen", "Materialität unabhängig einschätzen", "Mitigation/Enthaltung/Vertretung wählen", "Protokollieren", "nachträglich prüfen" ], "tools": [ "Interessenkonflikt-Check", "Conflict-of-interest register", "Vier-Augen-Prinzip", "D06 Council" ], "culture": "Cultural closeness or friendship is not banned wholesale; specific decision-making power is assessed.", "cross_checks": "D07 Power map · W01 Marketplace · W07 Investors · D06 Council · R09 Organisation check", "failure_modes": [ "Friendship Exception", "Disclosure dump without consequences", "Conflict Witch Hunt", "Insider Deal" ], "escalation": "For governing-body, procurement, personnel, fund or sanction decisions with a significant conflict, use external/higher-level review.", "output": "Conflict note with interest, assessment, measure, substitute and record.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 process pilot · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-D10", "core_id": "D10", "title": "Constitutional amendment & high thresholds", "activate_when": "fundamental rights, the mission, articles of association or foundational power/organisational rules are to be changed", "goal": "change fundamental rules more slowly, with better information and greater stability than everyday practice", "must_check": [ "Which normative level is affected?", "Why is a regulation/experiment not enough?", "Who bears lasting consequences?", "What transition and legitimate-expectation issues arise?", "Which legally required majority or registration applies?", "When will the change be reviewed?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No permanent constitutional amendment in a convenience-driven emergency.", "Fundamental rights require the highest threshold.", "Protection against retroactive effects and protection of existing claims are maintained." ], "recommended_path": [ "Änderungsdossier erstellen", "zwei Phasen/Abkühlzeit soweit passend", "Betroffene informieren und beraten", "gesetzliche/interne Hürde anwenden", "Minderheitenbericht und Änderungslog", "Eintragung/Übergang/Review" ], "tools": [ "Sleep on it", "Minority report", "Crystal ball", "Change log", "Rigidity check" ], "culture": "A Constitution Day can prepare changes, but cannot replace the required legal form.", "cross_checks": "F01 Fundamental rights · F06 Mission · D08 Norm architecture · D02 Voting · K07 Decision journal", "failure_modes": [ "Founder Lock", "Constitutional Inflation", "Every detail requires 75 %", "an emergency bypasses amendment safeguards" ], "escalation": "For amendments under GenG/to the articles of association, the audit association/notary/register procedure must be followed.", "output": "Constitutional amendment file with old/new norm, reasons, procedure, vote, transition and review.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · 🟡 majorities/deadlines with the charter and articles of association · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-W01", "core_id": "W01", "title": "Opportunities marketplace & matching", "activate_when": "an opportunity, task, position, learning opportunity, help, resource or cooperation is offered/matched", "goal": "create fair, voluntary matches between needs, competence, working mode and protection requirements", "must_check": [ "What exactly is the opportunity?", "Which working or usage arrangement applies?", "Payment/costs/voluntariness?", "Which skills/safety/quality?", "Which selection criteria?", "Which data and employment-status risks?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "The community does not allocate people.", "No secret ranking of people.", "Voluntary help must not conceal paid work.", "The reality of the contractual relationship determines status." ], "recommended_path": [ "Chance als Karte klassifizieren", "Kriterien/Preis/Risiko veröffentlichen", "Interessen sammeln", "transparent matchen", "Vertrag/Commons-/Lernregel abschließen", "Ergebnis und Fairness reviewen" ], "tools": [ "Opportunity card", "W05 Working Arrangement Check", "K05 Angeberschein", "F05 Fairness", "D09 Conflicts of interest" ], "culture": "Local language and a playful feel are possible; access criteria remain understandable.", "cross_checks": "W05 Working modes · W08 Quality · W10 Customer pool · K05 Angeberschein · D09 Conflicts of interest · T09 Operations", "failure_modes": [ "**Friend algorithm:** Old contacts are repeatedly favoured.", "**Reputation poverty trap:** No commission without evidence, no evidence without a commission.", "**Algorithmic boss:** “Recommendations” become orders in practice.", "**Hidden ranking:** Nobody knows why others see commissions." ], "escalation": "For uncertainty about employment/self-employment, safety, discrimination or sensitive data, seek specialist review.", "output": "Offer/match card with mode, payment, criteria, responsible people, contract and review.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 marketplace pilot · ⚖️ contract/status gate · 🔬 matching research" }, { "id": "OP-W02", "core_id": "W02", "title": "Tithe / community contribution", "activate_when": "external monetary value arises from an activity substantially enabled, organised or supported by FFE", "goal": "correctly calculate a single transparent 10% community share and direct all of it to GEG", "must_check": [ "Is the value transaction externally monetised and substantially enabled by FFE?", "What is the actual net payment received?", "Which genuine external direct or pass-through costs are deducted?", "Has a tithe already been applied to the transaction?", "How is the 90% pool distributed?", "What correction applies for cancellation/default?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "One value transaction — one tithe.", "No wage deduction.", "No automatic share for dynasties/integrators/offices.", "No toll on friendship or free lending." ], "recommended_path": [ "Zahlungseingang feststellen", "Umsatzsteuer/Erstattungen/Direktkosten trennen", "Gemeinschaftsbasis berechnen", "10 % an GEG buchen", "90-%-Pool projektbezogen verteilen", "transparent berichten/reviewen" ], "tools": [ "Tithe Rules v0.1", "W05 Status Check", "W06 GEG Budget", "W10 Customer pool" ], "culture": "Voluntary alms are possible for non-monetised lending, but not a hidden fee.", "cross_checks": "W01 Opportunities marketplace · W03 Commons pass · W04 Infrastructure · W05 Working modes · W06 GEG · W10 Customer pool · D09 Conflicts of interest", "failure_modes": [ "Wage-deduction trap", "Materials trap", "Pseudo-Freelancing", "concealed labour leasing" ], "escalation": "For uncertainty about tax, contracts, labour leasing or sector rules, seek specialist advice.", "output": "Tithe statement with payment, tax, direct costs, basis, 10%, 90%, booking and correction.", "norm_status": "✅ tithe regulations v0.1 adopted · 🧪 calculation/operations pilot · ⚖️ tax/contract gate" }, { "id": "OP-W03", "core_id": "W03", "title": "Commons-Pass", "activate_when": "an object, space, dataset, fund, tool, knowledge or other resource is shared", "goal": "establish clear boundaries, maintenance, costs, access, decisions and exit for a commons", "must_check": [ "What is the resource, and who legally owns it?", "Who may use it, and according to which criteria?", "Who maintains/pays for it?", "What happens in cases of scarcity, damage or misuse?", "Who decides on changes?", "How does the commons end or split?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Shared does not mean ownerless.", "No private capture of shared resources.", "Monitoring without unnecessary surveillance." ], "recommended_path": [ "Ressource/Owner definieren", "Nutzer-/Zugangsregeln", "Pflege/Kosten/Rollen", "Knappheit/Schaden/Konflikt", "Änderung/Exit/Rückbau", "Pilot und Review" ], "tools": [ "Commons-Pass", "Ostrom-Check", "D01 Subsidiarity", "F03 Exit" ], "culture": "Commons may have local rituals/a maintenance culture; rights and costs remain clear.", "cross_checks": "W02 Tithe · W04 Infrastructure · D01 Subsidiarity · F03 Exit · D07 Power map · R08 Lifecycle", "failure_modes": [ "**Tragedy by vagueness:** Nobody knows who is responsible.", "**Insider commons:** Formally shared, but in practice only friends have access.", "**Maintenance debt:** Everyone uses it, nobody maintains it.", "**Monitoring creep:** Resource protection becomes surveillance of people." ], "escalation": "For ownership, liability, data protection, hazardous substances or a large fund, seek specialist review.", "output": "Completed commons pass with resource, users, maintenance, costs, governance, conflict and ending.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 commons pass pilot · ⚖️ ownership/contract gate" }, { "id": "OP-W04", "core_id": "W04", "title": "Shared infrastructure", "activate_when": "a shared platform or space, tool, administration, AI or procurement infrastructure is being built", "goal": "reduce fixed costs, make independence easier and avoid lock-in", "must_check": [ "Who uses and finances the infrastructure?", "What problem does it measurably solve?", "What data/dependencies arise?", "How portable are content and relationships?", "What fallback or exit exists?", "When is building in-house worthwhile instead of using an external service?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No data or customer hostages.", "Infrastructure must not own the relationship.", "No investment without governance and a decommissioning path." ], "recommended_path": [ "Business Case und Nutzerbedarf", "Commons-/Daten-/Machtmodell", "kleiner Pilot", "Kosten/Nutzen/Abhängigkeit messen", "Portabilität/Fallback testen", "skalieren oder beenden" ], "tools": [ "Commons-Pass", "T05 Digital Constitution", "R06 Bureaucracy radar", "T10 Fallback" ], "culture": "Shared places and workshops may have a strong character; access remains fair.", "cross_checks": "W02 Tithe · W03 Commons pass · K10 Rubin AI · F03 Portability · T10 Fallback", "failure_modes": [ "**Infrastructure Empire**", "**Lock-in**", "**Build Everything Ourselves**", "**Single Point of Failure**" ], "escalation": "For high investment, sensitive data, monopoly dependence or legal risk, involve a higher level/specialist review.", "output": "Infrastructure decision brief with needs, costs, governance, data protection, exit and pilot.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · 🧪 business-case pilot · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-W05", "core_id": "W05", "title": "Working modes & fair remuneration", "activate_when": "a person works, helps, learns, provides care or regularly takes responsibility", "goal": "honestly distinguish work, learning, care and voluntary modes and provide fair remuneration", "must_check": [ "What is actually being done?", "Is it voluntary, learning, care or paid work?", "Who gives instructions and bears risk?", "What payment/performance obligation?", "How regular/necessary is the activity?", "Is Mojo replacing money or an assessment of employment status?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Meaning does not replace wages.", "Membership creates no obligation to work.", "Mojo replaces neither pay nor employment law.", "No fake-learning or pseudo-freelance arrangements." ], "recommended_path": [ "Vier Beziehungen markieren", "Arbeitsmodus- und Statuscheck", "Vergütung/Vertrag/Haftung klären", "Mojo/Freiwilligkeit getrennt dokumentieren", "bei Praxisänderung neu klassifizieren" ], "tools": [ "Arbeitsmodus-Karte", "Nein-Kosten-Test", "DRV-Statuscheck", "Mojo-Ordnung", "K05 Learning Plan" ], "culture": "Spontaneous neighbourly help may stay simple; recurring essential work is addressed structurally.", "cross_checks": "W01 Marketplace · W02 Tithe · B05 Care · K05 Academy · F02 Non-participation · W09 Management", "failure_modes": [ "**Community Discount:** meaning replaces wages.", "**Volunteer creep:** A voluntary exception becomes a permanent task.", "**Care blindness:** Necessary care remains invisible.", "**Fake learning:** Beginners do cheap productive work under a training label." ], "escalation": "For employment-status, tax, social insurance, training or labour-leasing risks, seek specialist advice.", "output": "Working-relationship card with affiliation, mode, mandate, task, payment, status and exit.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · ✅ Mojo pilot regulations v0.1 · 🧪 six-month review · ⚖️ employment/tax gate" }, { "id": "OP-W06", "core_id": "W06", "title": "GEG – shared pot, budget & solidarity", "activate_when": "tithes, donations, alms, fund, solidarity or community resources are planned, distributed or requested", "goal": "manage GEG transparently in purpose-specific pots and enable help without patronage or debts of loyalty", "must_check": [ "What is the source of the money?", "Which GEG pot and purpose restriction?", "Who decides up to what limit?", "Is there a conflict of interest?", "Is it a grant, loan, in-kind support or project budget?", "Does this create an insurance promise?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "The whole tithe belongs to the community.", "No institutional sinecures.", "Emergency aid is not based on Mojo.", "Help does not buy obedience." ], "recommended_path": [ "Geldstrom klassifizieren", "Haushalt/Fonds-Pass prüfen", "Befangenheit und Datenschutz", "Entscheidung innerhalb Delegationsgrenze", "auszahlen/dokumentieren", "Wirkung und Fondsliquidität reviewen" ], "tools": [ "GEG-Haushalt", "Fonds-Pass", "D09 Conflicts of interest", "F05 Equal treatment", "B05 Care" ], "culture": "Alms, thanks and solidarity rituals are possible; applicants do not owe public gratitude.", "cross_checks": "W02 Tithe · B05 Care & Mutual Aid · W03 Commons Pass · W07 Capital · F05 Equal Treatment · D09 Conflict of Interest", "failure_modes": [ "Budget black hole", "Patronage", "Shame about seeking help", "loyalty in exchange for money" ], "escalation": "For risk-related benefits resembling entitlements, seek insurance/legal review; for major spending, involve the whole community.", "output": "GEG decision with source, pot, purpose, amount, mode, data protection, decision and report.", "norm_status": "✅ GEG basic architecture adopted · 🟡 annual budget/sub-fund parameters · 🧪 initial pilot · ⚖️ insurance gate" }, { "id": "OP-W07", "core_id": "W07", "title": "Cooperative capital & investors", "activate_when": "membership shares, loans, grants, investors or other sources of capital are to be taken on", "goal": "raise capital without selling basic political equality and the mission", "must_check": [ "Which instrument, and for what purpose?", "What return/repayment?", "What information or participation rights?", "What concentration/dependence?", "What consequences for exit or crisis?", "Does it fit the articles of association and the member-benefit purpose?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Capital buys no basic political dignity, Mojo or additional vote.", "Promoting members' interests remains central.", "Individual funders must not control FFE in practice." ], "recommended_path": [ "Kapitalbedarf aus Wirtschaftsplan", "Instrumente vergleichen", "D07-Machtkarte", "Terms/Schutzgrenzen formulieren", "zuständig beschließen", "laufend berichten/reviewen" ], "tools": [ "Kapital-Termsheet", "Macht-Risiko-Matrix", "Mission-Fit", "Interessenkonflikt-Check" ], "culture": "Honorary titles or thanks for funding must not grant hidden political power.", "cross_checks": "W02 Community contribution · D02 Voting architecture · D07 Power map · D09 Conflict of interest · R05 Mission balance sheet", "failure_modes": [ "Investor Capture", "grant-driven mission drift", "a special deal for friends", "Capital = Mojo" ], "escalation": "For investing members, investment products, loans or larger instruments, involve the audit association/legal/tax advice.", "output": "Capital dossier with needs, instrument, rights, limits, return, concentration, exit and resolution.", "norm_status": "✅ political core adopted · 🟡 amounts/instruments in the economic plan · ⚖️ articles/capital gate" }, { "id": "OP-W08", "core_id": "W08", "title": "Brand, quality & liability", "activate_when": "a service or product under a shared brand is offered, approved or subject to a complaint", "goal": "consistently connect the brand promise, competence, quality, acceptance, liability and repair", "must_check": [ "What exactly does the brand promise?", "Which skills/evidence are required?", "Who checks/accepts the work?", "Who is liable and insured?", "How are rectification/recalls handled?", "What freedom over the process remains with those doing the work?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Brand access is not based on loyalty or opinions.", "A certificate does not replace ability.", "Safety and external authorisation take priority." ], "recommended_path": [ "Qualitätsversprechen definieren", "Skill-/Safety-Anforderungen", "Prüf-/Abnahmeplan", "Haftung/Versicherung/Vertrag", "Reklamation und Reparatur", "Qualitätsreview" ], "tools": [ "Quality card", "K05 Angeberschein", "T01 Safety Stop", "T08 Postmortem", "Commons-Markenregeln" ], "culture": "Mastery and advancement rituals may celebrate ability; approval remains objective.", "cross_checks": "W01 Marketplace · K05 Angeberschein · T03 Checklists/handoffs · T08 Postmortem · W04 Infrastructure", "failure_modes": [ "Brand Policing", "quality = loyalty", "a certificate replaces ability", "Unclear liability" ], "escalation": "For regulated trades, product safety, personal injury or recalls, involve a specialist body/insurer.", "output": "Quality and liability plan with promise, skill gate, assessment, acceptance, liability and repair.", "norm_status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open" }, { "id": "OP-W09", "core_id": "W09", "title": "Integrator & management", "activate_when": "several independent contributions, teams, dynasties or trades must be integrated into one outcome", "goal": "Coordinate interfaces professionally without creating hidden authority over staff", "must_check": [ "What is the integration mandate?", "Which decisions may the integrator make?", "Which contributions/dependencies?", "How is payment arranged?", "Where does coordination end and the power to give instructions/the employer role begin?", "How are conflicts/changes handled?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "An integrator does not own people, customers or dynasties.", "Mandate and payment visible in advance.", "No concealed employment or labour leasing." ], "recommended_path": [ "Integrator mandatieren", "Projekt-/Schnittstellenkarte", "Rollen und Handoffs", "Änderungs-/Konfliktweg", "Fortschritt/Abnahme", "Abschluss/Postmortem" ], "tools": [ "Integrator-Charter", "T03 Handoffs", "T09 Operations", "D09 Conflicts", "W05 Status Check" ], "culture": "Project culture may be playful; responsibility and contracts remain clear.", "cross_checks": "W01 Marketplace · W05 Working modes · D07 Power map · D01 Subsidiarity · R07 Succession", "failure_modes": [ "**Managerial Capture**", "**Information Monopoly**", "**Shadow Board**", "**Founder-Manager Fusion**" ], "escalation": "For instructions to personnel, liability, safety or employment-status risk, escalate to project management/legal review.", "output": "Integration plan with mandate, roles, interfaces, payment, decisions, handoffs and review.", "norm_status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open" }, { "id": "OP-W10", "core_id": "W10", "title": "Customer pool & customer relationships as a shared economic commons", "activate_when": "leads, CRM data, brand relationships, follow-up commissions or customer contacts are built/distributed together", "goal": "manage customer relationships as an economic commons without owning people or contacts", "must_check": [ "Where does the lead come from?", "Which FFE service is involved?", "Who may use the contact?", "Which data or consent rules?", "How is continuity ensured?", "What applies on exit, follow-up work or the tithe?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "A customer is not property.", "No perpetual tithe or contact ban without an actual FFE service.", "Data protection and the customer's wishes remain paramount." ], "recommended_path": [ "Lead/Beziehung klassifizieren", "CRM-Zugriff und Verantwortliche", "Vergabe-/Kontinuitätsregeln", "Zehnt/Service transparent", "Exit-/Übergaberegel", "Review und Datenbereinigung" ], "tools": [ "Kundenpool-Pass", "W02 Tithe", "F03 Exit", "F04 Data Protection", "D09 Conflicts of interest" ], "culture": "Relationships may grow into genuine personal connections; the community does not charge a toll on friendship.", "cross_checks": "W01 Marketplace · W02 Community contribution · W03 Commons pass · F03 Exit · D09 Conflict of interest", "failure_modes": [ "Customer feudalism", "CRM as a centre of power", "The “my customer” war", "The community appropriates private relationships" ], "escalation": "Seek specialist advice on data protection, competition or contract law, or disputed customer retention.", "output": "Customer relationship card with origin, access, responsibility, tithe, continuity and exit.", "norm_status": "🧪 experiment · ⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open" }, { "id": "OP-B01", "core_id": "B01", "title": "Admission & onboarding", "activate_when": "a person or organisation wants to become a guest, member or part of a dynasty", "goal": "create open, understandable and fair access with genuine mutual orientation", "must_check": [ "Which form of membership or guest status?", "Are fundamental rights and minimum duties understood?", "Are there specific safety or trust risks?", "Are criteria structured rather than based solely on gut feeling?", "What barriers or effects on diversity exist?", "Is there a review if someone is rejected?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Not merely a culture-fit test.", "No discrimination or admission by clique.", "Unpopularity and legitimate dissent are not grounds for rejection." ], "recommended_path": [ "klare Vorinformation", "strukturierte Kernfragen", "kleine reale Gemeinsame Tat soweit passend", "begründete Entscheidung", "Onboarding und Rechtezugang", "Review/Beschwerde" ], "tools": [ "Admission card", "Shared action", "F05 Fairness", "F09 Access to Rules", "B10 Warmth" ], "culture": "Welcoming rituals and local culture are possible; participation remains voluntary.", "cross_checks": "F01 Fundamental rights · F02 Non-participation · F03 Exit · B06 Freedom of ritual · B07 Multiple affiliations · K05 Academy", "failure_modes": [ "**Culture Fit:** similarity is mistaken for trustworthiness.", "**Friends' Club:** recommendations replace open access.", "**Sponsor Aristocracy:** an insider controls admission.", "**Ritual Test:** cultural participation becomes a hidden duty." ], "escalation": "For protection or legal risks, minors, legal entities or disputed rejection, involve the relevant legal or review body.", "output": "Admission/onboarding dossier with criteria, decision, rights, duties, data protection and review.", "norm_status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open" }, { "id": "OP-B02", "core_id": "B02", "title": "Repair ladder", "activate_when": "tension, a boundary violation, unreliability or minor harm occurs", "goal": "choose the least restrictive safe route to repair and escalate only as needed", "must_check": [ "How serious and urgent is the harm?", "Is a direct conversation safe?", "Is there a power imbalance or a pattern?", "What does the affected person need?", "Which level is sufficient?", "When is external or formal help needed?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No duty to speak directly when there is danger.", "No public shaming.", "Protection comes before reconciliation." ], "recommended_path": [ "Selbstklärung/kurze Korrektur", "direktes Gespräch", "unterstütztes Gespräch/Mediation", "Stammtisch/Rat", "formelle Schutz-/Sanktionsentscheidung", "Review" ], "tools": [ "Repair ladder", "D06 Triage", "Talking stone", "B03 Restitution" ], "culture": "Local conversation or reconciliation rituals are possible if voluntary and safe.", "cross_checks": "B03 Restorative justice · B04 Rehabilitation · D06 Council · F08 Proportionality · T01 Safety stop", "failure_modes": [ "**Endless Conversation:** protection is postponed for the sake of harmony.", "**Zero Tolerance:** minor mistakes lead straight to sanctions.", "**Forced Mediation:** affected people must “make peace” with the other party.", "**Public Shame:** repair becomes a spectacle." ], "escalation": "For violence, threats, discrimination, a criminal offence, fundamental rights or a recurring pattern, immediately involve a higher level or specialist body.", "output": "Recommended repair level with reasons, protection, people involved, next step and review.", "norm_status": "🟡 open" }, { "id": "OP-B03", "core_id": "B03", "title": "Restorative justice / restitution", "activate_when": "harm has been acknowledged and voluntary, safe restitution appears appropriate", "goal": "enable responsibility, concrete repair and possible reintegration rather than punishment alone", "must_check": [ "What happened and what harm resulted?", "What does the affected person need?", "Does the person who caused it take responsibility?", "Is participation voluntary and safe?", "What concrete restitution is realistic?", "How is completion checked?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No forced forgiveness.", "No substitute for protection, law or necessary sanctions.", "No degrading or dangerous rituals." ], "recommended_path": [ "separate Vorbereitung", "Geschichten/Schaden klären", "Verantwortung und Bedürfnisse", "Reparaturvereinbarung", "Umsetzung", "Review und ggf. Rückkehrritual" ], "tools": [ "Restitution agreement", "Repair path", "D06 Council", "B04 Rehabilitation" ], "culture": "Voluntary restitution challenges or rituals may be dignified, proportionate and locally chosen.", "cross_checks": "B02 Repair ladder · B04 Rehabilitation · D06 Council · F08 Proportionality · B06 Freedom of ritual", "failure_modes": [ "Forced Forgiveness", "Public Confession", "Harmony Pressure", "Centring the perpetrator" ], "escalation": "For immediate danger, a criminal offence, severe trauma or abuse of power, involve a professional or external body.", "output": "Restitution plan with harm, obligations, deadline, protection, review and reintegration.", "norm_status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open" }, { "id": "OP-B04", "core_id": "B04", "title": "Rehabilitation & a new reputation", "activate_when": "a decision is made about return, trust and reputation after a sanction, conflict or restitution", "goal": "enable a real fresh start without denying risks or history", "must_check": [ "Which conditions have been fulfilled and harms repaired?", "What risks exist today?", "Who needs to know which information?", "Which role is possible again?", "Is a gradual return needed?", "When is the next review?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No perpetual social punishment.", "No automatic return to full trust.", "Status or wealth must not make rehabilitation easier." ], "recommended_path": [ "Erfüllung prüfen", "aktuelles Risiko bewerten", "Rückkehrstufe/Rolle festlegen", "Information datensparsam aktualisieren", "Rückkehr begleiten", "Review und neuen Ruf ermöglichen" ], "tools": [ "Rehabilitation plan", "New reputation", "B03 Repair", "D07 Power-Risk Matrix" ], "culture": "A voluntary return or peace ritual can make the social transition visible.", "cross_checks": "B02 Repair ladder · B03 Restorative justice · D06 Council · D07 Power map · K05 Angeberschein", "failure_modes": [ "Eternal Record", "Secret Blacklist", "Forced Trust", "Safety Amnesia" ], "escalation": "For ongoing safety or legal risks, involve a protection body; for disputes, the council or an appeal process.", "output": "Rehabilitation decision with fulfilled conditions, current boundaries, return plan, data status and review.", "norm_status": "🟡 open" }, { "id": "OP-B05", "core_id": "B05", "title": "Care & Mutual Aid", "activate_when": "a person needs emotional, practical or material support, or care is organised on an ongoing basis", "goal": "offer voluntary, dignified and sustainable help without a debt of loyalty or invisible ongoing work", "must_check": [ "What help does the person actually want?", "What boundaries or privacy needs apply?", "Is professional help needed?", "Who has capacity?", "Is it one-off or structural?", "Are payment, rotation or automation needed instead of thanks?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Care is an offer, not compulsory emotional service.", "Help does not buy friendship, agreement or Mojo.", "Sensitive data stays protected." ], "recommended_path": [ "Bedarf/Einwilligung klären", "passende Helfer/GEG/Profis matchen", "Umfang/Grenzen/Notfall", "Hilfe leisten", "Belastung und Wiederholung reviewen", "Strukturproblem lösen" ], "tools": [ "Care-Karte", "GEG Solidarity", "Nein-Kosten-Test", "K06 Mentoring" ], "culture": "Thanks, food or rituals are possible, but never owed.", "cross_checks": "W06 Solidarity fund · F02 Non-participation · B10 Institutional warmth · K06 Mentoring · F04 Privacy", "failure_modes": [ "Care Debt", "Helper aristocracy", "Emotional duty", "“Family” as a claim on private life" ], "escalation": "For health, violence, child welfare, suicide or emergencies, or lasting overload, involve professional services.", "output": "Care plan with wishes, consent, scope, helpers, boundaries, data protection and review.", "norm_status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open" }, { "id": "OP-B06", "core_id": "B06", "title": "Freedom of ritual & costs-of-saying-no test", "activate_when": "a celebration, admission, transition, repair or cultural format is being designed", "goal": "enable a strong, diverse culture while ensuring genuine freedom around rituals", "must_check": [ "What is its purpose or meaning?", "Is participation genuinely voluntary?", "What are the costs of saying no?", "Is there a safe alternative?", "Is the ritual dignified, proportionate and accessible?", "When may it end or be changed?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No humiliation, danger or forced intimacy.", "No loss of rights or opportunities for not participating.", "Local culture must not override fundamental rights." ], "recommended_path": [ "Zweck erklären", "Freiwilligkeit/Consent/Alternative", "Safety und Barrieren prüfen", "kulturell gestalten", "durchführen", "Ritual-TÜV und ggf. beerdigen" ], "tools": [ "Nein-Kosten-Test", "Ritual-TÜV", "Advancement celebration", "Day of dead rules" ], "culture": "Communities and dynasties choose their own names, symbols, celebrations and rituals.", "cross_checks": "F02 Non-participation · B01 Admission · B07 Multiple affiliations · B10 Institutional warmth · R10 Constitution day", "failure_modes": [ "**Compulsory Rituals Through the Back Door**", "**Founder Folklore:** traditions become untouchable.", "**A Dare as Humiliation**", "**Sociability Filter:** introverts lose access." ], "escalation": "For pressure, sexualised or dangerous practices, minors or conflicts with fundamental rights, carry out a protection or legal review.", "output": "Ritual card with purpose, participation, alternative, safety, responsible people and review.", "norm_status": "🟡 open" }, { "id": "OP-B07", "core_id": "B07", "title": "Multiple affiliations", "activate_when": "members also belong to other groups, companies, cultures, parties, families or communities", "goal": "protect multiple affiliations as a freedom and a source of bridges, while clarifying real conflicts of interest", "must_check": [ "Is this merely a difference, or a concrete conflict in a decision?", "Which information or interests must be disclosed?", "Can a bridge create value?", "Is recusal or protection of confidential data needed?", "Is loyalty being wrongly understood as exclusivity?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No duty of exclusive affiliation.", "Outside contacts are not betrayal.", "Concrete conflicts of interest are addressed honestly." ], "recommended_path": [ "Zugehörigkeiten anerkennen", "konkreten Konflikt prüfen", "Offenlegung/Recusal falls nötig", "Brückenpotenzial nutzen", "keine Pauschalverdächtigung" ], "tools": [ "D09 Conflict of Interest", "F07 Anti-Totality", "Bridge Mojo" ], "culture": "Multiple cultures, holidays and identities may coexist.", "cross_checks": "F02 Non-participation · B08 Hospitality · T07 Network resilience · F05 Equal treatment · R01 Dynasties", "failure_modes": [ "Total Identity", "Loyalty test", "Outside contacts are treated as betrayal", "Bridge Elite" ], "escalation": "For conflicts involving confidentiality, competition or mandates, use D09 or a specialist review.", "output": "Affiliation/conflict note only when concretely needed, with mitigation and data protection.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment" }, { "id": "OP-B08", "core_id": "B08", "title": "Hospitality & open doors", "activate_when": "guests, visitors, interested people or partners receive temporary access to spaces, events or projects", "goal": "design open doors with clear hospitality, safety, privacy and exit arrangements", "must_check": [ "Who invites or hosts?", "Which spaces or information are accessible?", "Which rules must be understood?", "What protection or accessibility needs exist?", "How does the visit end?", "How can a guest find feedback channels or help?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "A guest is neither a member nor free labour.", "No surveillance without need.", "Private spaces and data stay protected." ], "recommended_path": [ "Einladung/Scope", "kurze Orientierung", "Host/Ansprechpartner", "Zugang/Safety/Privacy", "Feedback/Abschluss", "ggf. Aufnahmeweg erklären" ], "tools": [ "Gast-Pass", "Welcome ritual", "B10 Warmth", "F09 Access to Rules" ], "culture": "Hospitality may be locally creative; participation in culture remains voluntary.", "cross_checks": "B01 Admission · B07 Multiple affiliations · F04 Privacy · F05 Equal treatment · T07 Network resilience", "failure_modes": [ "Open-Washing", "A guest without clear boundaries", "Guests displace members", "Member data made public" ], "escalation": "For sensitive spaces, minors, safety or data protection, obtain additional approval.", "output": "Guest plan with host, access, rules, protection, duration and conclusion.", "norm_status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open" }, { "id": "OP-B09", "core_id": "B09", "title": "Rumours, gossip & conflict radius", "activate_when": "information about an absent person, a rumour, warning or reputational harm circulates", "goal": "direct relevant information to the right audience and a fair process", "must_check": [ "Is it private frustration, a safety warning or a formal allegation?", "Who really needs to know?", "What evidence or uncertainty?", "Can the person be spoken with?", "Is there danger or a power imbalance?", "May this information be relevant to a decision?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No formal decision based on unverifiable hearsay.", "No unnecessary publicity.", "Safety warnings may reach safe points of contact." ], "recommended_path": [ "Weiterverbreitung stoppen", "Kategorie/Risiko bestimmen", "kleinstmöglichen richtigen Kanal wählen", "Betroffene fair informieren soweit sicher", "prüfen statt behaupten", "minimal dokumentieren" ], "tools": [ "Gossip-Radius", "D06 Council", "B02 Repair ladder", "F04 Data Protection" ], "culture": "A good regulars' gathering talks with people, not about people.", "cross_checks": "B02 Repair ladder · B04 Rehabilitation · F04 Privacy · D07 Power map · F05 Equal treatment", "failure_modes": [ "Silence Culture", "“No gossip” protects abuse of power", "Public character assassination", "Private conflicts become community wars" ], "escalation": "For immediate danger, violence, vulnerable people or a possible criminal offence, immediately involve a protection or specialist body.", "output": "Routing note: category, audience, recipients, uncertainty, next fair step.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment" }, { "id": "OP-B10", "core_id": "B10", "title": "Institutional warmth", "activate_when": "onboarding, access to help, transitions, spaces or forms of communication are designed around people", "goal": "create institutional warmth without forcing friendship, closeness or emotional labour", "must_check": [ "Can a person find help and information?", "Can they say no?", "Who welcomes and explains?", "Are quiet or introvert-friendly routes possible?", "Are informal circles becoming a shadow parliament?", "How can a transition or departure be dignified?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No prescribed friendship.", "No exclusive clique as the gateway to power.", "Warmth must not displace privacy or non-participation." ], "recommended_path": [ "Willkommens-/Orientierungspfad", "auffindbare Hilfe", "mehrere Kontakt-/Teilnahmewege", "Check-in ohne Druck", "Übergänge/Abschied würdig", "Schattenmacht reviewen" ], "tools": [ "Welcome ritual", "Buddy/Guide", "Empty chair", "F02 Cost-of-Saying-No Test" ], "culture": "Food, humour, celebrations and symbols may create warmth; there must always be a quiet alternative.", "cross_checks": "F02 Non-participation · B05 Care · B06 Freedom of ritual · B07 Multiple affiliations · B08 Hospitality", "failure_modes": [ "Forced Fun", "Family Language", "Friendship Governance", "Party Participation = Status" ], "escalation": "For exclusion dynamics, bullying or a power clique, use F05/D07/D06.", "output": "Warmth and access plan with contact routes, opt-outs, transitions and a power check.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment" }, { "id": "OP-K01", "core_id": "K01", "title": "Evidence system", "activate_when": "a significant factual claim, scientific rationale or evidence-based recommendation is incorporated into a decision or the book", "goal": "make evidence quality, transferability, uncertainty and contrary findings visible", "must_check": [ "What kind of claim?", "Which primary source or study?", "What was actually studied?", "Which population and time period?", "How transferable is it to FFE?", "What contrary findings or uncertainty?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No citation theatre.", "A study is not a commandment.", "Value judgements remain democratic." ], "recommended_path": [ "Claim klassifizieren", "geeignete Primärquellen suchen", "Evidenzstempel", "Übertragbarkeit/Gegenbefund", "praktische Ableitung als Hypothese", "Pilot/Review" ], "tools": [ "Claim-to-Source-Karte", "Evidence stamp", "K03 Fact–Forecast–Value", "Community-Labor" ], "culture": "No particular ritual duty; learning from research can be celebrated publicly.", "cross_checks": "K02 Decision brief · K03 Fact–forecast–value · K07 Decision journal · K08 Community laboratory · D08 Norm architecture · R05 Mission balance sheet", "failure_modes": [ "**Citation Theater:** many sources, no clear claim.", "**Paper Worship:** a study replaces thinking.", "**Cherry Picking:** only evidence that fits.", "**Evidence Laundering:** a normative preference is sold as science." ], "escalation": "For high-risk or specialist domains, use external expertise and current primary sources.", "output": "Evidence card with claim, source, finding, limitations, transferability, inference and review.", "norm_status": "✅ foundational core" }, { "id": "OP-K02", "core_id": "K02", "title": "Decision brief", "activate_when": "a relevant collective decision is being prepared or affected people need to be informed", "goal": "create a shared, understandable information base before the decision", "must_check": [ "What is the exact question?", "Who decides and who is affected?", "Which options, including doing nothing?", "What are the strongest arguments for and against?", "Evidenz/Unsicherheit?", "Which process, and when?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "The brief does not make the decision itself.", "Do not deliberately hide any option or uncertainty.", "Advocacy is labelled as advocacy." ], "recommended_path": [ "Frage/Scope", "Optionen und Betroffene", "Argumente/Evidenz/Unsicherheit", "Verfahren/Zeitplan", "🥚/🍳/🔬 Ebenen", "Review durch Gegenposition" ], "tools": [ "Decision brief", "Minority report", "K03 Statement Types", "D04 Deliberation" ], "culture": "The design may be inviting; the content remains neutrally accessible.", "cross_checks": "K03 Fact–forecast–value · D04 Deliberation · D02 Voting · K01 Evidence system · K07 Decision journal", "failure_modes": [ "Neutrality Theater", "Information Dump", "Straw man", "hidden option" ], "escalation": "For fundamental rights, safety, law or major specialist uncertainty, add the relevant profiles or specialists.", "output": "Three-level decision brief with question, authority, options, arguments, evidence and process.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment" }, { "id": "OP-K03", "core_id": "K03", "title": "Fact – forecast – value", "activate_when": "debates mix facts, forecasts, values and design assumptions", "goal": "separate arguments clearly so that evidence, uncertainty and democratic value judgements are not confused", "must_check": [ "Is the statement a fact, forecast, value or design hypothesis?", "What evidence or probability?", "Who decides the conflict of values?", "When can the forecast be checked?", "Which assumption is hidden?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Values are not disguised as “science says”.", "Forecasts are not rewritten after the fact.", "Factual errors remain correctable." ], "recommended_path": [ "Sätze markieren", "Fakten prüfen", "Prognosen mit Wahrscheinlichkeit/Datum", "Werte offen deliberieren", "Designhypothese pilotieren", "später reviewen" ], "tools": [ "Fakt–Prognose–Wert-Karte", "Forecast Ledger", "K07 Journal", "K01 Evidence" ], "culture": "No particular ritual duty; updating an opinion may be acknowledged positively.", "cross_checks": "K01 Evidence system · K02 Decision brief · K07 Forecast ledger · D04 Deliberation · R05 Mission balance sheet", "failure_modes": [ "Value Laundering", "A forecast treated as fact", "Dismissing a fact as merely an opinion", "False precision" ], "escalation": "For a critical specialist claim, use K01/K04; for a conflict of values or fundamental rights, the relevant democratic level.", "output": "Argument card with statement type, evidence, probability, value conflict and review date.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment" }, { "id": "OP-K04", "core_id": "K04", "title": "Expertise & teach-back", "activate_when": "a decision depends on specialist knowledge, certification or expert judgement", "goal": "use expertise without turning it into greater political standing or unchallengeable authority", "must_check": [ "Which specific domain?", "What experience or evidence?", "Which dissenting specialist opinions?", "Can the explanation be understood through teach-back?", "Is there a conflict of interest?", "Is immediate safety at stake?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Expertise carries weight in matters of knowledge, not an extra vote.", "No authority outside the domain.", "Safety leadership remains narrowly scoped and reviewable." ], "recommended_path": [ "Fachfrage definieren", "geeignete Expertise auswählen", "Erklärung + Teach-back", "Unsicherheit/Dissens", "Entscheidung durch zuständige Ebene", "Ergebnis überprüfen" ], "tools": [ "Teach-back", "Expertise-Karte", "D09 Conflicts of interest", "T01 Safety Stop" ], "culture": "Master or teaching titles may celebrate expertise but do not replace a current assessment.", "cross_checks": "K01 Evidence system · D04 Deliberation · K05 Angeberschein · K09 Transactive memory · T01 Safety stop", "failure_modes": [ "Rule by experts", "Anti-Expertise", "Teach-back as a test", "False certainty" ], "escalation": "For regulated work, high safety stakes or strong dissent, obtain a second or external specialist opinion.", "output": "Expertise note with domain, evidence, explanation, boundaries, dissent and recommended action.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment" }, { "id": "OP-K05", "core_id": "K05", "title": "Academy, Angeberschein & skill trees", "activate_when": "a skill is learned, evidenced, authorised, renewed or used as a prerequisite", "goal": "document real, safe competence portably and open up domain-specific development paths", "must_check": [ "Which specific skill and boundary?", "What practice or evidence?", "Which level?", "Which safety or legal requirements?", "How current and portable is it?", "Who may confirm it?", "Is reassessment needed?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No global ranking of people.", "A certificate does not replace competence.", "Mojo and popularity do not replace evidence of a skill.", "External authorisation remains external." ], "recommended_path": [ "Lernziel/Skill-Knoten", "beobachtete Praxis/Feedback", "passenden Nachweis", "Angeberschein ausstellen", "Aufstieg feiern falls gewünscht", "Aktualität/Erneuerung reviewen" ], "tools": [ "Angeberschein", "Skill Tree", "Teach-back", "Demonstration of mastery", "Advancement celebration" ], "culture": "Dynasties may choose their own titles and ceremonies; their technical meaning stays interoperable.", "cross_checks": "K04 Expertise · K06 Mentoring · K09 Transactive memory · W01 Marketplace · W08 Quality · F03 Portability", "failure_modes": [ "**Credentialism:** a certificate replaces competence.", "**Skill Aristocracy:** expertise becomes a political hierarchy.", "**No-First-Chance Trap:** no evidence without a job, no job without evidence.", "**Mentor Monopoly:** only a few may confirm skills." ], "escalation": "For regulated trades, safety, minors or assessment disputes, involve a specialist or legal body.", "output": "Skill-pass entry with skill, level, evidence, boundaries, confirmation, currency and portability.", "norm_status": "✅ rank/competence and advancement architecture adopted · 🧪 assessment/skill-tree pilot · ⚖️ qualification/safety gate · 🔬 research" }, { "id": "OP-K06", "core_id": "K06", "title": "Mentoring & multiplying knowledge", "activate_when": "knowledge is concentrated in a few people or someone wants supported learning", "goal": "transfer knowledge so learners become independent and mentors' power remains limited", "must_check": [ "What does the learner want to be able to do?", "What boundaries and time frame?", "What real practice?", "Is mentoring paid or voluntary?", "Is dependency or pressure for loyalty developing?", "How does the relationship end or get handed over?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "A mentor does not own the learner.", "No allegiance in return.", "Do not disguise productive work as learning." ], "recommended_path": [ "Ziel und Vereinbarung", "Beobachten/erklären", "begleitet ausführen", "Feedback/Teach-back", "selbstständig freigeben", "Beziehung beenden/weiterentwickeln" ], "tools": [ "Mentoring-Pakt", "K05 Skill Tree", "Teach-back", "Second chair" ], "culture": "Completion and progression may be celebrated together.", "cross_checks": "K05 Angeberschein · K09 Transactive memory · T04 Bus factor · W05 Working modes · D07 Power map", "failure_modes": [ "Mentor Monopoly", "Patronage", "Unpaid mentoring burden", "“my student”" ], "escalation": "For exploitation, safety, dependency or compensation questions, use W05/D09 or a specialist body.", "output": "Mentoring plan with goal, roles, mode, practice, feedback, independence criterion and end.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment" }, { "id": "OP-K07", "core_id": "K07", "title": "Decision journal & review", "activate_when": "an important decision is made involving assumptions, forecasts or a need for later learning", "goal": "make decision quality and learning visible without ranking people", "must_check": [ "What options and reasons?", "What assumptions or values?", "Which forecasts or probabilities?", "What risks or counterarguments?", "When and how should it be reviewed?", "What would count as disconfirming evidence?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No ranking people as the “best decision-maker”.", "Do not score value judgements with Brier scores.", "No retrospective reinterpretation of the original reasons." ], "recommended_path": [ "Entscheidungsakte vor Beschluss", "Prognosen separat erfassen", "Alternative/Nichtstun", "Reviewdatum/Signale", "später Erwartung vs Realität", "Lernpunkte/Regeländerung" ], "tools": [ "Decision Journal", "Forecast Ledger", "Premortem", "Crystal ball", "Postmortem" ], "culture": "A reasoned change of opinion may be celebrated as learning.", "cross_checks": "K01 Evidence system · K02 Decision brief · K08 Community laboratory · R05 Mission balance sheet · T08 Postmortem", "failure_modes": [ "**Paper Trail Theater**", "**Blame Archive**", "**Too Much Logging**", "**Outcome Bias**" ], "escalation": "For serious harm, use T08 or protection procedures; for conflicting evidence, K01.", "output": "Decision journal with knowledge at the time, reasons, forecasts, risks and review.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment" }, { "id": "OP-K08", "core_id": "K08", "title": "Community-Labor", "activate_when": "a new method, institution, app feature or way of working has not yet been sufficiently tried", "goal": "learn in a controlled way without treating fundamental rights or protection as experimental material", "must_check": [ "Which question or hypothesis?", "Wer/was ist im Scope?", "Which rights or risks?", "Which success metric and counter-metric?", "For how long?", "When is it stopped or scaled?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "An experiment is not an exception to fundamental rights.", "No secret experiments.", "Do not pilot essential services without safeguards." ], "recommended_path": [ "Protokoll/Hypothese", "Rechte/Safety/Consent", "kleiner Scope", "Messung/Monitoring", "Stop/Review", "behalten/reparieren/abschaffen" ], "tools": [ "Experiment Canvas", "K07 Journal", "F08 Proportionality", "T01 Safety Stop" ], "culture": "Experiments may be playful; participation and experimental status stay visible.", "cross_checks": "K01 Evidence system · K07 Decision journal · R08 Institutional lifecycle · F01 Fundamental rights · F04 Privacy", "failure_modes": [ "Permanent Pilot", "A/B Rights", "Metric Gaming", "An experiment without a baseline" ], "escalation": "For significant risk, legal issues, vulnerable groups or sensitive data, carry out a specialist, ethics or legal review.", "output": "Experiment protocol with hypothesis, scope, protection, measurement, duration, stop and review.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-K09", "core_id": "K09", "title": "Transactive memory / “Who knows what?”", "activate_when": "it is unclear who holds which knowledge, or critical knowledge depends on a few people", "goal": "build a reliable shared answer to “Who knows what, and where is it?”", "must_check": [ "Which knowledge is critical?", "Who can apply or explain it?", "Where is it documented?", "Who is the backup?", "How current and accessible is it?", "Which data must not be widely visible?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No surveillance graph of competence or friendship.", "Knowledge holders retain data protection and boundaries.", "No individual as a permanent bottleneck." ], "recommended_path": [ "Wissensinventar", "Person/Quelle/Ort verknüpfen", "Zugriff und Datenschutz", "Backup/Mentoring", "Aktualisierungsrhythmus", "Bus-Test" ], "tools": [ "Einstein der Weisen", "Knowledge market", "Bus-Test", "K06 Mentoring", "T04 Continuity" ], "culture": "Knowledge markets and learning festivals may make expertise visible.", "cross_checks": "K05 Angeberschein · K06 Mentoring · K10 Rubin AI · T04 Bus factor · D07 Power map", "failure_modes": [ "Knowledge Aristocracy", "Outdated expert list", "“Always ask X”", "AI becomes the only search interface" ], "escalation": "For critical safety, confidential or root knowledge, use T05/T06 and the responsible specialist role.", "output": "Knowledge map with topic, sources, contacts, access, backup, currency and gaps.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-K10", "core_id": "K10", "title": "Rubin AI as a navigator", "activate_when": "Rubin-KI or another AI explains a rule, routes cases or produces specific instructions for action", "goal": "apply current FFE norms and methods understandably without simulating power, truth or human worth", "must_check": [ "What is the situation, and which facts are missing?", "Which core pages or profiles are activated?", "Which norm takes precedence?", "What is a rule, recommendation or experiment?", "Which data does the AI really need?", "When must a human or specialist body decide?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "AI is a navigator, not a government.", "No invented norm or hidden score.", "Manueller/humaner Fallback bleibt.", "Archives are not routed as current rules." ], "recommended_path": [ "Fall klassifizieren", "relevante operative Profile/Methodenkarten laden", "fehlende Informationen fragen", "Grenzen/Optionen/empfohlenen mildesten Weg erklären", "Eskalation und Unsicherheit markieren", "strukturierte Ausgabe erzeugen" ], "tools": [ "69 operational profiles", "M12 Method library", "K02 Decision brief", "T10 Fallback" ], "culture": "AI may use cultural language but must keep function and voluntariness understandable.", "cross_checks": "F04 Privacy · F09 Access to rules · D08 Norm architecture · W01 Marketplace · K01 Evidence · T05 Access power · T06 Cybersecurity · T10 Fallback", "failure_modes": [ "**Automation Bias:** people trust AI too quickly.", "**Silent Constitution:** code changes governance.", "**Social Scoring:** helpful data becomes an overall ranking of people.", "**Data Creep:** ever more data because it is “useful”." ], "escalation": "For law, safety, medicine, serious conflict, fundamental rights or high uncertainty, involve a human specialist or decision-making body.", "output": "FFE guidance with activated IDs, questions, boundaries, steps, tools, escalation, status and sources.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment · ⚖️ legal gate · 🔬 research" }, { "id": "OP-T01", "core_id": "T01", "title": "Stop-the-line / safety stop", "activate_when": "a plausible, specific danger to people, property, the environment or critical systems is identified", "goal": "stop dangerous activity within a narrow scope and safely authorise its resumption", "must_check": [ "Which specific danger?", "How urgent is it, and how broad is the scope?", "What must be made safe immediately?", "Which expertise determines authorisation to resume?", "Which safe alternative?", "How should it be documented and reviewed?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "A justified safety stop must not be punished for being inconvenient.", "Safety is not a blanket political veto.", "Stop only as much and as long as necessary." ], "recommended_path": [ "Stop auslösen", "Bereich sichern", "zuständige Personen informieren", "Gefahr fachlich bewerten", "Freigabekriterien/Maßnahmen", "Wiederaufnahme und Review" ], "tools": [ "Stop-the-Line", "F08 Proportionality", "T02 Incident", "K04 Expertise" ], "culture": "Clear shared stop signals can be practised culturally.", "cross_checks": "F08 Proportionality · B02 Repair ladder · T02 Incident mode · T08 Postmortem · K04 Expertise · W05 Working modes", "failure_modes": [ "**Rights on Paper:** officially anyone may stop work, but in practice they are punished.", "**Safety Veto:** a safety argument becomes a weapon for political obstruction.", "**Cry Wolf:** repeated unfounded stops destroy trust.", "**Rank Override:** the boss ignores operational expertise." ], "escalation": "For immediate danger to life or health, emergency services, authorities or specialists come before community processes.", "output": "Safety-stop record with danger, scope, safeguards, expertise, resumption criteria and restart.", "norm_status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open" }, { "id": "OP-T02", "core_id": "T02", "title": "Incident-Modus", "activate_when": "an accident, near miss, attack, data breach, outage or serious operational disruption occurs", "goal": "limit harm, coordinate responsibilities and then learn at a systemic level", "must_check": [ "How serious and time-critical is it?", "Who or what must be protected?", "Which roles and communication channels?", "Which evidence or data must be secured?", "What external reporting duties?", "When should normal operations or the postmortem begin?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Stabilise before assigning blame.", "No cover-up.", "Privacy and fair treatment apply during an incident too." ], "recommended_path": [ "Incident aktivieren", "Schutz/Containment", "Rollen/Kommunikation", "Beweise/Handoffs", "Wiederherstellung", "T08 Postmortem und Maßnahmen" ], "tools": [ "Incident Card", "Closed Loop", "T01 Stop", "T10 Fallback", "T08 Postmortem" ], "culture": "Calm shared rituals or signals can reduce panic; facts remain clear.", "cross_checks": "T01 Safety stop · T08 Postmortem · F08 Proportionality · T10 Fallback · D01 Subsidiarity", "failure_modes": [ "Permanent Emergency", "unclear incident lead", "multiple command", "no closure" ], "escalation": "For an emergency, criminal offence, reporting duty, health or cyber incident, involve external bodies immediately.", "output": "Incident log with severity, timeline, protection, roles, communication, recovery and follow-up.", "norm_status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open" }, { "id": "OP-T03", "core_id": "T03", "title": "Checklists, closed loop & handoffs", "activate_when": "critical recurring steps, handovers or messages are prone to error", "goal": "reduce memory and communication errors with lean checklists and confirmed handoffs", "must_check": [ "Which few errors are critical?", "Who sends and receives?", "What must be confirmed back?", "What does not belong on the checklist?", "How is currency checked?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No checklist bureaucracy for trivial work.", "No hidden micromonitoring.", "Ticking boxes does not replace responsibility." ], "recommended_path": [ "kritische Punkte identifizieren", "kurze Checkliste/Closed Loop/Handoff bauen", "mit Nutzern testen", "in Ablauf einbetten", "Fehlerdaten reviewen und kürzen/ändern" ], "tools": [ "Checklist", "Closed Loop", "Handoff-Template", "T08 Postmortem" ], "culture": "Teams may use their own terms or signals as long as misunderstandings are ruled out.", "cross_checks": "T01 Safety stop · T02 Incident mode · W09 Integrator · W08 Quality · T08 Postmortem", "failure_modes": [ "Checklist Theater", "Ticking boxes without an actual check", "The list is too long", "No owner" ], "escalation": "For safety or legal processes, use the professional standard; for overload, R06 Bureaucracy Radar.", "output": "Process card with trigger, checklist, confirmation, handover, responsible person and version.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment · 🔬 research" }, { "id": "OP-T04", "core_id": "T04", "title": "Bus factor & continuity", "activate_when": "a function, access or knowledge depends on individual people", "goal": "ensure continuity without constant availability or a cult of heroes", "must_check": [ "Which key person or resource?", "What stops working if they or it are unavailable?", "Who is the second chair?", "Which documentation or access is missing?", "How often is handover practised?", "What safety boundaries apply to redundancy?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Nobody owes constant availability.", "Redundancy must not duplicate secrets without control.", "Being irreplaceable is not an ideal status." ], "recommended_path": [ "kritische Abhängigkeiten kartieren", "zweiten Stuhl/Backup bestimmen", "Dokumentation/Zugriffe", "Übergabe/Drill", "Ausfall testen", "regelmäßig reviewen" ], "tools": [ "Bus-Test", "Second chair", "K09 Knowledge Map", "T05 Access Constitution" ], "culture": "Handover and enabling others may merit Mojo and celebration.", "cross_checks": "R07 Succession · T10 Fallback · W04 Infrastructure · K09 Transactive memory · D07 Power map", "failure_modes": [ "Fake Backup", "Password-in-One-Head", "documented but untested", "founder bottleneck" ], "escalation": "For root, financial or safety access, use T05/T06/D09; for founder dependency, R07.", "output": "Continuity plan with function, consequences of failure, backup, documentation, access and test date.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment" }, { "id": "OP-T05", "core_id": "T05", "title": "Digital constitution & access power", "activate_when": "digital platforms, admin rights, keys, deployments or algorithmic rules are being designed", "goal": "limit technical access power like constitutional power and make it accountable", "must_check": [ "Who owns or manages systems and keys?", "Which roles or rights?", "Who can change rules or data alone?", "Which logs and reviews?", "How do emergency access, succession and exit work?", "What vendor dependency exists?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No root dictator.", "Least privilege and no secret rule changes.", "Admin rights are power and require oversight." ], "recommended_path": [ "System-/Owner-Inventar", "Rollen-/Rechtematrix", "Mehr-Augen-/Recovery-Design", "Logs/Change-Prozess", "Notfall/Nachfolge/Exit", "regelmäßiger Access Review" ], "tools": [ "Digital Constitution", "Access Matrix", "D07 Power map", "T06 Security", "T10 Fallback" ], "culture": "Technical titles or symbols may recognise competence; they do not create political authority.", "cross_checks": "K10 Rubin AI · F04 Privacy · D07 Power map · T06 Security · T10 Fallback", "failure_modes": [ "Founder Root", "Shared Admin Password", "Silent Policy Change", "Audit Log controlled by same actor" ], "escalation": "For critical infrastructure, payment data, personal data or external hosting, carry out a security or legal review.", "output": "Digital constitution with ownership, roles, rights, logs, changes, emergency access, succession and exit.", "norm_status": "🟡 open · 🔬 research" }, { "id": "OP-T06", "core_id": "T06", "title": "Cybersecurity & Privacy Engineering", "activate_when": "a system, device, network or data process is built, changed or operated", "goal": "build in security and data protection from the start and make failures or attacks manageable", "must_check": [ "Which assets or data?", "Which threats or misuse?", "Which authentication or permissions?", "Backup/Recovery?", "Patch-/Lieferkette?", "Logging/Incident?", "Which data can be avoided?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Security does not justify total surveillance.", "Data minimisation is a protective measure.", "No insecure default access." ], "recommended_path": [ "Threat Model", "minimale Architektur", "Kontrollen/Hardening", "Backup/Recovery", "Test/Monitoring", "Incident/Review" ], "tools": [ "Threat Model", "Privacy Engineering", "T05 Access", "T02 Incident", "T10 Fallback" ], "culture": "Security culture may be practised playfully but must not create a culture of blame or fear.", "cross_checks": "F04 Privacy · T05 Access power · T02 Incident mode · T10 Fallback · K10 Rubin AI", "failure_modes": [ "Security Theater", "Founder Admin", "Logging Everything", "Backups never tested" ], "escalation": "For personal or critical data, payment or health systems, or an attack, involve specialists and observe duties towards authorities.", "output": "Security/privacy plan with assets, threats, controls, tests, recovery and responsible people.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-T07", "core_id": "T07", "title": "Network resilience", "activate_when": "suppliers, income, knowledge, infrastructure or connections are too concentrated", "goal": "create diversity, bridges, alternatives and controlled redundancy to handle disruptions", "must_check": [ "Which nodes or dependencies?", "What is the single point of failure?", "Which alternatives or substitutes?", "Which interfaces connect diversity?", "What costs does redundancy create?", "How is failure practised?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Diversity without interfaces is fragmentation.", "Redundancy must not be unjustified waste.", "No monoculture for convenience." ], "recommended_path": [ "Netzkarte", "kritische Konzentrationen", "Diversifizieren/Brücken/Reserven", "Fallback/Verträge", "Störungssimulation", "Review" ], "tools": [ "Resilience card", "Bus-Test", "R02 Federation", "T10 Fallback" ], "culture": "Dynasties may develop different strategies; interoperability remains shared.", "cross_checks": "D07 Power map · B07 Multiple affiliations · K09 Transactive memory · T04 Bus factor · R01 Dynasties", "failure_modes": [ "Hub Worship", "Bridge Toll", "Total Social Graph", "Centrality = human worth" ], "escalation": "For critical supplies, financial, cyber or safety risks, involve a higher level or specialist planning.", "output": "Resilience plan with nodes, dependencies, alternatives, costs, drills and review.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment" }, { "id": "OP-T08", "core_id": "T08", "title": "Error report & postmortem", "activate_when": "an error, outage, near miss or unexpected result creates a need to learn", "goal": "learn from events without hiding those responsible or shaming people", "must_check": [ "What happened, and when?", "Which conditions or decisions interacted?", "What worked?", "Which protection or system gaps?", "Which measures, owners and deadlines?", "When do we check effectiveness?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "A postmortem does not replace personal responsibility.", "No blame culture or cover-up.", "Protect sensitive data." ], "recommended_path": [ "Timeline und Fakten", "Beitragsfaktoren statt Monokausalität", "Schutz/Verantwortung getrennt behandeln", "Maßnahmen priorisieren", "Owner/Frist", "Follow-up und Lernen teilen" ], "tools": [ "Postmortem", "Use Five Whys with care", "K07 Journal", "Reparatur-Mojo" ], "culture": "A work harvest or learning ritual can recognise honest failure.", "cross_checks": "T01 Safety stop · K07 Decision journal · B02 Repair ladder · B04 Rehabilitation · R09 Organisation check", "failure_modes": [ "**Blameless Theater**", "**Scapegoating**", "**Postmortem Fatigue**", "**Action Item Graveyard**" ], "escalation": "For a criminal offence, safety, data breach reporting duties or serious harm, involve an external body in parallel.", "output": "Postmortem with timeline, factors, impact, measures, owners, deadlines and follow-up.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment" }, { "id": "OP-T09", "core_id": "T09", "title": "Operations & logistics", "activate_when": "recurring work, capacity, materials, dates or several parallel projects are being coordinated", "goal": "organise visible workflow, realistic capacity and reliable handovers", "must_check": [ "What demand and capacity exist?", "Which bottlenecks, queues or WIP?", "Who owns the next step?", "Which stocks or deadlines?", "Which dependencies?", "How are changes communicated?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No hidden ranking of individuals' productivity.", "No unrealistic utilisation as the norm.", "System metrics before surveillance." ], "recommended_path": [ "Flow/Prozess kartieren", "WIP/Kapazität sichtbar", "Rollen/Verantwortung", "Status/Handoffs", "Abweichung/Neuplanung", "regelmäßiger Ops-Review" ], "tools": [ "Operations Board", "Kanban/WIP-Limit", "T03 Handoff", "W09 Integrator" ], "culture": "Team rituals such as short stand-ups are optional and should be assessed for usefulness.", "cross_checks": "W01 Marketplace · W09 Integrator · T03 Handoffs · W04 Infrastructure · R06 Bureaucracy radar", "failure_modes": [ "Productivity Surveillance", "WIP limit as compulsory work", "Throughput Worship", "Deadline Gaming" ], "escalation": "For safety, working-time or employment law, critical logistics or overload, involve the responsible body.", "output": "Operations plan with flow, capacity, WIP, roles, stocks, dates, risks and review.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment · 🔬 research" }, { "id": "OP-T10", "core_id": "T10", "title": "Graceful degradation & manual fallback", "activate_when": "technology, staffing or infrastructure partly fails and minimum operations must be maintained", "goal": "continue in a controlled, limited mode and return safely to normal operations", "must_check": [ "Which functions are truly essential?", "Which levels of degraded operation?", "Which manual or offline route?", "What data consistency or safety?", "Who declares the limited mode?", "How are recovery and reconciliation handled?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Rights and help must not be accessible only digitally.", "A manual fallback must not be unsafe.", "Degraded operation must not secretly become the permanent standard." ], "recommended_path": [ "kritische Funktionen priorisieren", "Degradationsstufen/Fallback definieren", "Rollen/Kommunikation", "regelmäßig drillen", "Recovery", "Daten/Entscheidungen reconciliieren" ], "tools": [ "Fallback-Runbook", "T02 Incident", "T04 Continuity", "T06 Recovery" ], "culture": "Clear symbols for operating modes can provide orientation.", "cross_checks": "K10 Rubin AI · T04 Bus factor · T05 Access power · T02 Incident mode · F09 Access to rules", "failure_modes": [ "Paper Fallback", "Backup not restorable", "manual mode unknown", "stale offline rules" ], "escalation": "At a safety or legal boundary, stop the service rather than degrade it unsafely.", "output": "Fallback runbook with levels, essential functions, manual routes, roles, recovery and reconciliation.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment" }, { "id": "OP-R01", "core_id": "R01", "title": "Dynasties & polycentric circles", "activate_when": "a group works together long-term or grows around a place, field, project, culture, product or commons", "goal": "build autonomous dynasties with their own cultures, skill and office pathways, and clear shared boundaries", "must_check": [ "What is the purpose and scope?", "Which members, rights and exit?", "Which skills and capacities?", "Which offices or councils are actually needed?", "Which commons, money or data?", "Which interfaces to FFE and other dynasties?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "A dynasty is not a feudal fiefdom.", "Fundamental rights and portable membership rights remain.", "Add structure only in response to a real trigger." ], "recommended_path": [ "Dynastie-Charter", "Fähigkeitsportfolio", "Stammtisch/Räte", "Ämter-Kompass", "Commons/Schnittstellen", "Organisationsreview und Rückbau" ], "tools": [ "Development network", "Office Compass", "Local circle", "Commons-Pass", "Dynastie-Mojo" ], "culture": "Names, ranks, rituals and celebrations are chosen locally; technical meanings stay compatible.", "cross_checks": "D01 Subsidiarity · W03 Commons pass · B07 Multiple affiliations · T07 Network resilience · R02 Federation", "failure_modes": [ "Local Fiefdom", "Dynasty = clique of friends", "Rule shopping", "Duplicate infrastructure" ], "escalation": "For legal entity status, employment, large funds, safety or federal conflicts, involve a higher level or specialist review.", "output": "Dynasty charter with purpose, rights, portfolio, councils/offices, commons, interfaces, exit and review.", "norm_status": "✅ dynasty/office/development architecture adopted · 🧪 organisation pilot · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-R02", "core_id": "R02", "title": "Federation / Die Illuminati", "activate_when": "several dynasties or communities have a genuinely shared task, infrastructure, norm or external relationship", "goal": "create a federal level with enumerated powers without swallowing local autonomy", "must_check": [ "Which task cannot be fully resolved locally?", "Which powers are explicitly delegated?", "How are communities represented?", "How are costs, information and appeals governed?", "How do powers return to the local level, or exit take place?", "Which fundamental rights or interfaces apply jointly?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Die Illuminati is not a secret supreme authority.", "Powers are enumerated, not unlimited.", "Local agency and fundamental rights remain." ], "recommended_path": [ "gemeinsame Aufgabe definieren", "Kompetenzinventar", "Vertretungs-/Entscheidungsverfahren", "Finanzierung/Schnittstellen", "Transparenz/Appeal", "Review/Rückdelegation" ], "tools": [ "Federation pact", "Competence inventory", "D01 Subsidiarity", "D02 Procedures", "R03 Split" ], "culture": "The cultural name Die Illuminati is self-ironic; genuine transparency remains mandatory.", "cross_checks": "R01 Dynasties · D01 Subsidiarity · W03 Commons · W07 Capital · T07 Network resilience · R03 Friendly separation", "failure_modes": [ "Die Illuminati becomes an overlord", "A large community dominates", "A solidarity fund permanently rescues bad structures", "Federal administration becomes an end in itself" ], "escalation": "For a separate legal entity, cross-border activity, capital, staff or matters involving the statutes, carry out a specialist review.", "output": "Federation pact with tasks, powers, representation, financing, transparency, exit and review.", "norm_status": "✅ federal direction and cultural name adopted · 🟡 specific powers later · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-R03", "core_id": "R03", "title": "Friendly separation", "activate_when": "a dynasty or organisation is too large, divided or differently oriented, making a split appropriate", "goal": "enable separation without narratives of betrayal, theft of assets or destroyed relationships", "must_check": [ "Why split?", "Who wants to go where?", "Which contracts, assets, data or customers?", "Which brand or commons?", "Which shared obligation remains?", "How are transition and later cooperation governed?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "A split is not automatically a failure.", "No forced assignment of people.", "Shared assets are handled fairly and transparently." ], "recommended_path": [ "Motive/Optionen klären", "Übergangs-/Schutzvereinbarung", "Menschen wählen lassen", "Assets/Verträge/Daten aufteilen", "Marke/Schnittstellen", "Abschluss und Kooperationspfad" ], "tools": [ "Freundliche-Teilung-Plan", "F03 Exit", "W03 Commons pass", "W10 Customer pool" ], "culture": "Farewell or founding rituals may recognise the new independence.", "cross_checks": "F03 Exit & portability · R01 Dynasties · R02 Federation · W10 Customer pool · W03 Commons", "failure_modes": [ "A split threat used as negotiating blackmail", "The winner takes the brand, data and customers", "The founder claims ownership of history", "A minority is bought out without protection" ], "escalation": "For legal form, employment contracts, assets, IP or data, obtain external advice.", "output": "Separation agreement with people's choices, assets, contracts, data, brand, transition and cooperation.", "norm_status": "⚖️ legal gate · 🟡 open" }, { "id": "OP-R04", "core_id": "R04", "title": "Growth check", "activate_when": "membership, revenue, locations, data, staff or reach are intended to grow significantly", "goal": "allow growth only if rights, operations, culture, money and controls can keep pace", "must_check": [ "What benefit and mission fit?", "What capacity, safety or data load?", "What power or bureaucracy?", "Which onboarding or quality structure?", "Which threshold stops growth?", "Would splitting or federation be better?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Growth is not an end in itself.", "No scaling at the expense of rights or safety.", "Pilot before irreversible expansion." ], "recommended_path": [ "Wachstumshypothese", "Kapazitäts-/Macht-/Rechtecheck", "Alternativen inkl. Teilung/Föderation", "begrenzter Pilot", "Gate-Kriterien", "Review und Go/Stop" ], "tools": [ "Growth check", "R05 Mission balance sheet", "D07 Power map", "R06 Bureaucracy radar" ], "culture": "Growth may be celebrated without confusing size with value.", "cross_checks": "F06 Mission · R05 Mission balance sheet · R02 Federation · W07 Capital · R09 Organisation check", "failure_modes": [ "Growth = Success", "Mission Washing", "Bureaucracy grows faster than benefits", "Capital dictates expansion" ], "escalation": "For capital, employment, new locations, regulated activities or data protection, carry out a specialist review.", "output": "Growth decision with mission, capacity, risks, gate, pilot, alternatives and review.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment" }, { "id": "OP-R05", "core_id": "R05", "title": "Mission balance sheet & drift watch", "activate_when": "an annual review, or one before major strategic changes, checks whether FFE serves its economic and social purpose", "goal": "make economic performance and multidimensional mission impact visible together", "must_check": [ "What was achieved economically?", "What freedom, capability or infrastructure?", "Who benefited, and who bore the costs?", "Where did power concentrate?", "What external impact?", "What mission drift?", "Which counter-metrics contradict the success story?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No single mission score.", "No PR report without contrary findings.", "Financial gain alone does not prove mission success." ], "recommended_path": [ "Dimensionen/Metriken und Geschichten sammeln", "Wirtschafts- und Missionsbilanz trennen", "Betroffenen-/Außenperspektiven", "Drift und Zielkonflikte beraten", "Maßnahmen/Owner", "nächstes Review" ], "tools": [ "Mission-Bilanz", "K07 Review", "D07 Power map", "R09 Organisational Check" ], "culture": "Annual rituals may celebrate impact and reveal blind spots.", "cross_checks": "F06 Mission · W02 Tithe · W04 Infrastructure · R04 Growth · R09 Organisation check", "failure_modes": [ "**Mission Washing**", "**Metric Capture**", "**Purity Spiral**", "**Financial Denial**" ], "escalation": "For serious legal, financial or protection problems, involve the responsible specialist or governance level.", "output": "Mission report with dimensions, data, stories, counter-metrics, drift and measures.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment" }, { "id": "OP-R06", "core_id": "R06", "title": "Bureaucracy radar", "activate_when": "forms, rules, evidence requirements or administrative work regularly create friction and exclusion", "goal": "retain necessary protection while reducing unnecessary learning, time and stress costs", "must_check": [ "What purpose does the process serve?", "Who bears learning, compliance or psychological costs?", "Which evidence is requested repeatedly?", "Can it be automated, reused or removed?", "Which protective function must not be lost?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Simplification must not weaken fundamental rights, safety, tax or legal duties.", "No data collection merely for administrative convenience.", "Not all bureaucracy is useless." ], "recommended_path": [ "Reibung melden/messen", "Zweck und Kosten kartieren", "entfernen/vereinfachen/wiederverwenden/automatisieren", "Pilot", "Gegenmetrik Schutzwert", "Sunset/Review" ], "tools": [ "Bureaucracy radar", "Friction report", "Rule Court", "T03 Checklist" ], "culture": "A Day of Dead Rules can culturally retire unnecessary administration.", "cross_checks": "F09 Access to rules · K10 Rubin AI · R09 Organisation check · R08 Lifecycle · W04 Infrastructure", "failure_modes": [ "Cutting bureaucracy as a religion of deregulation", "Compliance disappears; risk remains", "AI automates a bad process", "Forms get shorter, but the logic remains incomprehensible" ], "escalation": "For a legal duty or safety, obtain specialist review before removal.", "output": "Bureaucracy review with purpose, distribution of costs, change, protective counter-metric and sunset.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment · 🔬 research" }, { "id": "OP-R07", "core_id": "R07", "title": "Founder dependence & succession", "activate_when": "FFE, knowledge, relationships or decisions depend too heavily on Rubin or other founders or key people", "goal": "preserve the founders' story while reducing operational and political dependency", "must_check": [ "Which knowledge, network or access is unique?", "What must be documented or distributed?", "Which role is honour, and which is power?", "Who is the backup or successor?", "How does founder memory work without AI rule?", "What happens on withdrawal, death or conflict?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No founder worship as a duty of obedience.", "The Caesar title will not be reassigned to another human.", "AI does not inherit special political rights." ], "recommended_path": [ "Abhängigkeitskarte", "Wissen/Gründe dokumentieren", "zweite Personen und Übergaben", "Zugänge/Netzwerke institutionalisieren", "Gründer-Gedächtnis", "Ausfall-/Nachfolgedrill" ], "tools": [ "Bus-Test", "Second chair", "K09 Knowledge", "K10 Founder Memory", "D07 Power map" ], "culture": "Founders' dignity and forms of remembrance may be strong; history is not falsified.", "cross_checks": "D03 Caesar · D07 Power map · T04 Bus factor · W09 Management · R08 Lifecycle", "failure_modes": [ "Founder Syndrome treated as a personal insult", "Crown Prince", "Ghost Government", "undocumented founder network" ], "escalation": "For questions about governing bodies, statutes or representation, obtain legal review; for abuse of power, an independent mirror council.", "output": "Founder/succession plan with dependencies, documentation, backups, access, remembrance and a crisis path.", "norm_status": "✅ founder/succession core adopted · 🧪 developing the founder memory" }, { "id": "OP-R08", "core_id": "R08", "title": "Institutionen-Lebenszyklus", "activate_when": "an institution is emerging, stagnating, becoming unnecessary, causing harm or due for replacement", "goal": "be able to deliberately germinate, test, establish, repair and retire institutions", "must_check": [ "Which problem or purpose?", "Which season: germination, experiment, institution or wind-down?", "What evidence, use or costs?", "What power and side effects?", "Would we found it again today?", "What transition consequences?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No institution is an end in itself.", "Wind-down protects acquired rights and transitions.", "Archives are preserved." ], "recommended_path": [ "DNA/Phase bestimmen", "Nutzen/Kosten/Macht prüfen", "Regelgericht", "behalten/reparieren/testen/beerdigen", "Übergang", "Museum/Review" ], "tools": [ "Institutionen-DNA", "Rule tribunal", "Day of dead rules", "Museum of dead rules" ], "culture": "Funeral and founding rituals may make institutional learning visible.", "cross_checks": "K08 Community laboratory · R06 Bureaucracy radar · R09 Organisation check · D10 Constitutional amendment · R10 Constitution day", "failure_modes": [ "Sunset Everything", "Eternal Pilot", "Zombie Institution", "The owner prevents abolition" ], "escalation": "For statutes, contracts, staff, assets or fundamental rights, use D10 or legal review.", "output": "Lifecycle decision with phase, findings, judgement, transition, archive and review.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment · ⚖️ legal gate" }, { "id": "OP-R09", "core_id": "R09", "title": "Organisations-Check", "activate_when": "the health of a community, dynasty or organisation is reviewed regularly", "goal": "identify multiple problem areas early and route them to suitable in-depth assessments", "must_check": [ "How are mission, power, bureaucracy, safety, continuity, culture and finances doing?", "Which groups experience this differently?", "Which signals are symptoms rather than an overall grade?", "Which in-depth review is needed?", "Who takes responsibility for measures?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "No overall score for the community or people.", "Traffic lights are a guide, not a judgement.", "No metric replaces accounts from affected people." ], "recommended_path": [ "mehrdimensionale Signale sammeln", "Betroffenen-/Minderheitenperspektive", "Risiken priorisieren", "zu Fachdiagnosen routen", "Maßnahmen/Owner", "Follow-up" ], "tools": [ "Organisations-Check", "Mission-Bilanz", "Power map", "Bureaucracy radar", "Bus-Test" ], "culture": "Community-TÜV may be a recurring shared format without public shaming.", "cross_checks": "D07 Power map · R05 Mission balance sheet · R06 Bureaucracy radar · T04 Bus factor · F03 Exit · R10 Constitution day", "failure_modes": [ "**Dashboard Theater**", "**Greenwashing**", "**Metric Gaming**", "**Audit Fatigue**" ], "escalation": "For red safety, fundamental-rights or financial signals, start the relevant procedures immediately; do not wait for the annual review.", "output": "Organisational report with dimensions, signals, affected people's perspectives, in-depth checks and measures.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment" }, { "id": "OP-R10", "core_id": "R10", "title": "Constitution Day", "activate_when": "rights, power, mission, rules, rituals and open constitutional questions are reviewed together annually", "goal": "combine shared institutional learning, culture and concrete rule maintenance in an understandable cycle", "must_check": [ "Which rights work in practice?", "Where is power concentrating?", "Which rules or rituals are dead or harmful?", "Which pending changes require D10?", "Which successes and mistakes do we celebrate or learn from?", "Which minority reports are reopened?" ], "hard_bounds": [ "Constitution Day does not replace legally required decision-making procedures.", "Participation in culture remains voluntary.", "No rushed changes to fundamental rights." ], "recommended_path": [ "Vorbereitung/Brief", "Bilanz/Feier/Erinnerung", "Themenstationen und Stachelrunde", "Regelgericht", "formelle Beschlüsse getrennt durchführen", "Änderungslog/Museum/Aufgaben" ], "tools": [ "Constitution Day", "Hofnarr", "Stachelrunde", "Day of dead rules", "Museum", "D10" ], "culture": "Communities may shape the culture of their Constitution Day; multiple ways to participate are mandatory.", "cross_checks": "D10 Constitutional amendment · R05 Mission balance sheet · R09 Organisation check · R08 Lifecycle · D07 Power map · K07 Decision journal", "failure_modes": [ "Constitution Day as a founder show", "A ritual peak decides fundamental rights", "Annual renegotiation of everything", "Criticism becomes a cultural programme" ], "escalation": "For changes to statutes or law, start the formal D10/GenG route; for safety, start a separate procedure immediately.", "output": "Annual report with findings on rights, power and mission, judgements on rules, resolutions, tasks and review dates.", "norm_status": "🧪 Experiment" } ], "decision_method_schema": { "fields": [ "id", "name", "category", "best_for", "avoid", "steps", "example", "strength", "risk", "minority", "strategy", "complexity", "legal", "status", "ai_rule", "links" ], "coverage": "22 cards for all currently planned FFE decision types" }, "decision_methods": [ { "id": "V01", "name": "Simple majority", "category": "binding · binary", "best_for": "a clear, reversible yes/no question with two well-formulated alternatives", "avoid": "fundamental rights, several options artificially compressed into two, or groups affected very unequally", "steps": [ "Define the question and status quo", "Clarify abstentions and quorum", "Ja/Nein abstimmen", "Count valid votes", "Record the result and consequences for minorities" ], "example": "Should a reversible trial be extended by three months?", "strength": "Very understandable and quick", "risk": "A narrow majority can repeatedly outvote those strongly affected", "minority": "Requires additional review of fundamental rights and who is affected", "strategy": "Agenda and question design remain strategic", "complexity": "niedrig", "legal": "Law or statutes may require a different threshold", "status": "FFE default for simple reversible substantive questions", "ai_rule": "When exactly two viable options exist and no higher law applies, suggest V01.", "links": [ "D02", "F05", "F08" ] }, { "id": "V02", "name": "Absolute majority", "category": "binding · threshold", "best_for": "an individual election or decision requiring more than half of a previously defined reference group", "avoid": "when it is unclear whether the reference group means all members, those present or valid votes", "steps": [ "Determine the reference group in advance", "Hold the first round of voting", "Check the threshold", "If it is not reached, apply the predefined follow-up process" ], "example": "A board candidate needs more than half of the valid votes.", "strength": "Broader support than a plurality", "risk": "Enthaltung/Abwesenheit kann faktisch blockieren", "minority": "Does not automatically protect minorities but raises the acceptance threshold", "strategy": "Strategic abstention is possible", "complexity": "Low to medium", "legal": "Statutes or law may define the reference group", "status": "Suitable for important individual roles", "ai_rule": "Recommend only when the reference group and follow-up process are explicitly defined.", "links": [ "D02", "D10" ] }, { "id": "V03", "name": "Qualified majority", "category": "binding · high threshold", "best_for": "a decision on statutes, the constitution or a structure that is difficult to reverse", "avoid": "everyday decisions or situations that create a permanent blocking minority", "steps": [ "Determine the level of the norm", "Check the legal minimum threshold", "Justify a higher internal threshold", "Informations-/Bedenkzeit", "abstimmen", "Document transition and review" ], "example": "Changing a constitutional principle with a three-quarters majority and two readings.", "strength": "Stability and broad support", "risk": "Obstruction of necessary reforms and status quo bias", "minority": "Can protect a small minority but also create a powerful blocking group", "strategy": "Strategic obstruction", "complexity": "mittel", "legal": "GenG and the statutes take precedence", "status": "D10-Spezialfall", "ai_rule": "For a fundamental norm that is difficult to reverse, recommend V03 plus D10.", "links": [ "D10", "F01", "F08" ] }, { "id": "V04", "name": "Plurality Voting", "category": "binding · single winner", "best_for": "a small, low-risk election with a clear field of candidates", "avoid": "many similar candidates, high stakes or a desire for majority acceptance", "steps": [ "One vote per person", "Close the candidate list", "The highest vote count wins", "Apply the tie-breaking rule" ], "example": "Electing a temporary celebration coordinator from two clear candidates.", "strength": "Extremely simple", "risk": "The winner may not be preferred by a majority; vote splitting", "minority": "Weak minority protection", "strategy": "Strategic candidacy and tactical voting", "complexity": "niedrig", "legal": "Only as permitted by the statutes or rules", "status": "Only for low stakes or a very clear field", "ai_rule": "With more than two serious candidates, usually recommend V05/V06/V09 instead of V04.", "links": [ "D02" ] }, { "id": "V05", "name": "Runoff / Two-Round", "category": "binding · single winner", "best_for": "an important individual role or option where a final majority is desired", "avoid": "high effort, or when a compromise candidate might be lost in the first elimination", "steps": [ "First round of voting", "Check the majority threshold", "Determine the leading candidates under a predefined rule", "Second round of voting", "Record the result" ], "example": "Electing a board member from four candidates.", "strength": "Understandable and creates a clear final choice", "risk": "A second voting date; strategic first-round voting; a compromise option may be eliminated", "minority": "The final round provides broader legitimacy, but not proportional representation", "strategy": "Tactical first-round votes and coalitions", "complexity": "Low to medium", "legal": "Observe rules for elections to governing bodies", "status": "Suitable for important individual roles", "ai_rule": "For a single role and a desire for a majority mandate, suggest V05.", "links": [ "D02", "D09" ] }, { "id": "V06", "name": "Approval Voting", "category": "binding or advisory · multiple approval", "best_for": "several acceptable options or candidates, similar alternatives or a search for broad acceptance", "avoid": "when intensity or a complete ranking is central", "steps": [ "Describe all options clearly", "Each person marks all acceptable options", "Count approvals", "Winner or Top-N under a predefined rule" ], "example": "From five project ideas, mark all those you would consider responsible to fund.", "strength": "Simple and reduces the spoiler effect", "risk": "Individual approval thresholds differ", "minority": "Makes broad acceptance visible, but gives intense minorities less weight", "strategy": "Bullet Voting or strategically approving only a few options", "complexity": "niedrig", "legal": "For formal elections, check the statutes or rules", "status": "Preferred for several substantive options or open candidate fields", "ai_rule": "When multiple options can be acceptable at once, check V06 first.", "links": [ "D02", "K02" ] }, { "id": "V07", "name": "Score Voting", "category": "binding or advisory · scale", "best_for": "prioritisation and comparison when the strength of approval is useful", "avoid": "fundamental rights, incomprehensible scales or situations dominated by tactical extreme scores", "steps": [ "Define a shared scale and its meaning", "Rate each option", "Define aggregation: mean/sum/median", "Show the result and distribution" ], "example": "Rate five infrastructure projects from 0 to 5 according to usefulness.", "strength": "Provides more preference information", "risk": "False precision and differing uses of the scale", "minority": "Intense minorities become visible, but aggregation can obscure them", "strategy": "Extreme scores and strategic use of the scale", "complexity": "mittel", "legal": "For binding elections to governing bodies, only after legal and statutory review", "status": "Suitable for reversible prioritisation", "ai_rule": "Recommend V07 when nuance matters and the group understands the scale.", "links": [ "D02", "K03" ] }, { "id": "V08", "name": "STAR Voting", "category": "binding or advisory · Score + Runoff", "best_for": "a single winner where nuance and a final majority decision are desired", "avoid": "small groups without time for explanation, or an election with rigid legal rules", "steps": [ "Assess options", "Determine the two highest total scores", "Evaluate a direct runoff between them using the higher individual rating" ], "example": "Identify the top two scores among several location options and decide by direct comparison.", "strength": "Combines rating information and a final comparison", "risk": "More complex and less familiar", "minority": "Can encourage broadly rated compromise options", "strategy": "Strategic scoring remains possible", "complexity": "medium to high", "legal": "Internal pilot; check formal elections to governing bodies beforehand", "status": "Community-Labor/Spezialfall", "ai_rule": "Suggest only when V07 is desired but a clear single winner with a final comparison is needed.", "links": [ "D02", "K08" ] }, { "id": "V09", "name": "Instant-runoff / ranked-choice voting", "category": "binding · single winner", "best_for": "multiple candidates/options without a separate second date", "avoid": "when vote counting cannot be explained transparently, or formal law requires something else", "steps": [ "Complete or partial ranking", "Count first preferences", "Eliminate the weakest option", "Transfer votes", "until a winner is determined" ], "example": "Electing a spokesperson from five candidates.", "strength": "More preference information and a single voting date", "risk": "Non-monotonic or paradoxical effects; more complex counting", "minority": "A minority option can transfer preferences, but there is no proportionality", "strategy": "Strategic ranking remains possible", "complexity": "mittel", "legal": "Coordinate formal elections to governing bodies with the statutes and auditing association", "status": "A special case when the method is understood", "ai_rule": "Recommend V09 only if the group understands ranked voting and an audit is possible.", "links": [ "D02" ] }, { "id": "V10", "name": "Condorcet / Ranked Pairs", "category": "binding or advisory · pairwise comparisons", "best_for": "finding an option with broad compromise potential in direct comparisons", "avoid": "when the group does not understand the evaluation variant, or a quick hand count is needed", "steps": [ "Collect ranking data", "Make pairwise comparisons", "Check for a Condorcet winner", "If there is a cycle, apply a preselected variant such as Ranked Pairs", "Publish the audit" ], "example": "Compare three location options in pairs to find the compromise that commands a majority.", "strength": "strong emphasis on compromise", "risk": "Cycles and variants require explanation", "minority": "Can represent a majority-supported centre, but not proportional multi-seat representation", "strategy": "Strategic ranking and candidate nomination", "complexity": "hoch", "legal": "Internal specialist method; review elections to governing bodies", "status": "Wissens-/Spezialwerkzeug", "ai_rule": "Recommend when pairwise comparison is explicitly desired and the method is sufficiently well understood.", "links": [ "D02", "K04" ] }, { "id": "V11", "name": "Borda Count", "category": "advisory or special election · rank points", "best_for": "translating complete rankings into an overall priority", "avoid": "a highly strategic binding election or a field strongly dependent on the options included", "steps": [ "Assign ranks", "Define point values for each rank", "Add up points", "Verteilung/Robustheit zeigen" ], "example": "A workshop prioritises ten topics using rank points.", "strength": "uses the entire ranking", "risk": "Vulnerable to strategic ranking and irrelevant additional options", "minority": "Takes second and third preferences into account, but does not formally protect minorities", "strategy": "tactically ranking lower", "complexity": "mittel", "legal": "better suited to internal prioritisation", "status": "Spezialfall/beratend", "ai_rule": "Suggest V11 as a prioritisation tool rather than a core election method.", "links": [ "D02", "K08" ] }, { "id": "V12", "name": "Single Transferable Vote (STV)", "category": "binding · proportional multi-seat election", "best_for": "several council seats with preferences and representation as plural as possible", "avoid": "a single seat, a very small group or insufficient counting expertise", "steps": [ "Sitzanzahl/Quote festlegen", "Collect ranked votes", "Transfer elected candidates and surplus votes", "Eliminate the weakest", "Until all seats are filled" ], "example": "Electing seven council members from different currents.", "strength": "More proportional and less all-or-nothing", "risk": "Complex counting and parameters", "minority": "Strong effect on minority representation and diversity", "strategy": "Tactical ranking is possible, but more limited", "complexity": "hoch", "legal": "Check representative and governing-body rules and the statutes", "status": "A strong candidate for larger multi-seat councils", "ai_rule": "For several seats and a representation goal, check V12 preferentially.", "links": [ "D02", "D05" ] }, { "id": "V13", "name": "Cumulative voting", "category": "binding · multi-seat election", "best_for": "minorities should be able to win a seat by pooling several votes", "avoid": "when vote trading, dominance or poor comprehensibility is a problem", "steps": [ "Each person receives as many votes as there are seats or defined credits", "Distribute votes freely among candidates", "The highest totals win" ], "example": "Three seats; each person may distribute three votes to one or more people.", "strength": "Enables concentrated minority representation", "risk": "Acts like vote weighting and can encourage coordination or gaming", "minority": "Good minority access with a coordinated group", "strategy": "Vote pooling and electoral agreements", "complexity": "mittel", "legal": "Carefully check legal one-member-one-vote limits", "status": "Only a specialist pilot outside the basic political vote", "ai_rule": "Not for general membership voting; only a clearly limited multi-seat method after legal review.", "links": [ "D02", "F05" ] }, { "id": "V14", "name": "Proportional Approval Voting (PAV)", "category": "binding/advisory · proportional multi-winner vote", "best_for": "several projects or seats with approval data and a desire for proportional coverage", "avoid": "a small, simple decision or insufficient calculation or audit capability", "steps": [ "Collect approval votes", "Sitz-/Projektzahl festlegen", "Determine the combination using a proportional utility function", "Present an auditable result" ], "example": "Choose four from ten project proposals so that different supporter groups are represented.", "strength": "Combines multiple approval and proportionality", "risk": "significantly more complex algorithmically", "minority": "Stronger minority access than simple Top-N approval", "strategy": "strategic approval thresholds", "complexity": "hoch", "legal": "Internal pilot; review formal elections", "status": "Community-Labor/Spezialfall", "ai_rule": "Suggest only for a multiwinner proportionality problem with technical transparency.", "links": [ "D02", "K08" ] }, { "id": "V15", "name": "Consent", "category": "operational · objection procedure", "best_for": "a small accountable circle and a reversible, good-enough decision", "avoid": "fundamental rights, legally governed voting, unclear objection criteria or strong dependency", "steps": [ "Proposal and scope", "Clarifying questions", "Reaktionen/Verbesserung", "Serious, reasoned objections", "Integrate the objection or choose a separate route", "Review date" ], "example": "A team tests a new process for four weeks, provided no specific serious objection remains.", "strength": "Able to act without complete enthusiasm", "risk": "Facilitator power and inflation or suppression of objections", "minority": "An objection can provide protection but is not a general minority veto", "strategy": "Strategic objections or social pressure", "complexity": "mittel", "legal": "Does not replace a legally required decision by a governing body", "status": "Default for reversible operational circles", "ai_rule": "For a small operational scope, reversibility and clear responsibility, suggest V15.", "links": [ "D04", "K08" ] }, { "id": "V16", "name": "Consensus", "category": "deliberative · shared viability", "best_for": "a small group whose joint action cannot practically work without broad agreement", "avoid": "large groups, time pressure, power imbalances or situations where silence is read as agreement", "steps": [ "Clarify interests and needs", "Develop proposals", "Address objections", "Ask explicitly whether everyone can support it", "Dissens/Exit dokumentieren" ], "example": "A small shared household agrees on a common rule for their private home life.", "strength": "strong internal commitment", "risk": "pressure to reach consensus, hidden vetoes, endless meetings", "minority": "Can strongly protect minorities, but also create an individual veto", "strategy": "Deadlock and apparent agreement", "complexity": "medium to high", "legal": "No substitute for a legally required majority", "status": "An experiment or process, not a universal obligation", "ai_rule": "Recommend only when genuinely joint implementation requires broad agreement and exit and protection are available.", "links": [ "D04", "F02" ] }, { "id": "V17", "name": "Lottery / sortition", "category": "selection · temporary", "best_for": "advisory or review councils, new perspectives and access to power without election campaigns", "avoid": "roles requiring specialist qualifications, permanent executive power or a manipulated pool", "steps": [ "Define the mandate", "Form a suitable pool of volunteers", "Offset barriers", "Draw lots transparently", "trainieren/informieren", "Set a time limit/review" ], "example": "A temporary mirror council is drawn by lot from a trained volunteer pool.", "strength": "Distributes access independently of popularity", "risk": "pool bias, low participation, briefing/moderator capture", "minority": "Can include underrepresented perspectives; requires pool design", "strategy": "Manipulating the pool rather than the draw", "complexity": "mittel", "legal": "Does not replace statutory bodies or professional duties", "status": "D05 pilot and a strong review mechanism", "ai_rule": "For temporary advice or review and a recurring availability elite, consider V17.", "links": [ "D05", "D07" ] }, { "id": "V18", "name": "Liquid Delegation", "category": "binding/advisory · revocable delegation", "best_for": "a large network with topic-specific self-selection and delegable expertise", "avoid": "a small group, lack of transparency or uncontrolled superdelegates", "steps": [ "Define the topic area", "Direct vote or delegation", "visible delegation chains", "revocable at any time", "Konzentrationsgrenzen/Review", "Vote" ], "example": "A member revocably delegates environmental questions to a trusted specialist.", "strength": "Flexible between direct and delegated participation", "risk": "Concentration of power, chains and technical dependency", "minority": "Can facilitate access but does not automatically protect minorities", "strategy": "Delegation campaigns and superdelegates", "complexity": "hoch", "legal": "Experimental only; check the statutes and GenG", "status": "Experiment", "ai_rule": "Suggest only in a large network, by topic, revocably and with visible concentration.", "links": [ "D02", "D07", "K10" ] }, { "id": "V19", "name": "Quadratic Voting", "category": "experimental · intensity credits", "best_for": "express the intensity of several preferences with identical, limited credit allocations", "avoid": "the basic political vote, purchasable credits, essential rights or limited understanding of the method", "steps": [ "equal, non-purchasable credits", "The cost of additional votes is quadratic", "Optionen/Periode festlegen", "result plus distribution", "Gaming-/Fairnessreview" ], "example": "A community lab prioritises several experimental features.", "strength": "Makes strong preferences visible", "risk": "Complex, vulnerable to credit or identity manipulation, and close to currency", "minority": "An intense minority can gain weight, but equal resources are critical", "strategy": "credit strategy, Sybil/coalition gaming", "complexity": "hoch", "legal": "Core votes must never be purchasable; legal review", "status": "Community laboratory only", "ai_rule": "Only as a limited, non-purchasable pilot outside legally governed core politics.", "links": [ "D02", "K08", "F05" ] }, { "id": "V20", "name": "Participatory budgeting", "category": "budgeting process · combined", "best_for": "distribute a clearly bounded community budget through proposals, review and democratic selection", "avoid": "the entire core budget without reserves or legal review, or essential emergency aid", "steps": [ "Budget/Regeln festlegen", "Collect and support proposals", "Check feasibility and costs", "Deliberation", "Wahl/Priorisierungsmethode", "Umsetzung/Reporting" ], "example": "A community allocates a 10.000 € project budget to local initiatives.", "strength": "Combines ideas, learning and real resources", "risk": "Popular, visible projects dominate; implementation costs", "minority": "Separate windows for minorities or needs are possible", "strategy": "Campaign and mobilisation advantages", "complexity": "medium to high", "legal": "Check budget, authority and procurement law", "status": "Suitable for a limited community budget", "ai_rule": "For a clearly limited voluntary project budget, recommend V20 plus suitable V06/V07/V14.", "links": [ "W06", "D02", "D09" ] }, { "id": "V21", "name": "Dot voting / multi-dot polling", "category": "advisory · workshop", "best_for": "a quick, non-binding shortlist, agenda or topic cluster", "avoid": "a final decision on rights, staffing or money", "steps": [ "Visible options", "Each person receives equal points", "Distribute points", "Discuss patterns", "Treat the result as input only" ], "example": "A workshop marks which five questions should be explored further.", "strength": "Very quick and visual", "risk": "Peer pressure, herding and false precision", "minority": "A minority can become visible but is easily outvoted", "strategy": "Pooling points and early anchors", "complexity": "niedrig", "legal": "Advisory only, without formal legal effect", "status": "Workshopwerkzeug", "ai_rule": "Only as a preliminary filter or agenda, never as a hidden binding decision.", "links": [ "D04", "K02" ] }, { "id": "V22", "name": "Drawing lots / random tie-break", "category": "tie-break · low risk", "best_for": "a genuine tie between equivalent, reversible options, or a fair order", "avoid": "high stakes, fundamental rights, mandatory competence or unequal options", "steps": [ "Establish equivalence and a tie beforehand", "Define the random procedure in advance", "Draw publicly and auditably", "Record the result" ], "example": "Two equally suitable teams allocate a pilot starting place by lot.", "strength": "Neutralises power struggles where there is genuine equivalence", "risk": "Chance can obscure responsibility", "minority": "Fair for equivalent opportunities, not for protection needs", "strategy": "Manipulation of the pool or draw", "complexity": "niedrig", "legal": "Only where legally permitted", "status": "Tie-Break-Spezialfall", "ai_rule": "Suggest only when equivalence is genuinely justified and the decision is reversible.", "links": [ "D02", "D05" ] } ] }